Search published articles


Showing 4 results for Gabapentin
Comparative study of the effect of neurotec vs gabapentin on sensory symptoms of patients with diabetic neuropathy
Hadi Gharebaghian, Mehri Amiri, Sepideh Seydi,
Volume 81, Issue 3 (6-2023)
Abstract
Background: Diabetes is the most common cause of peripheral neuropathy throughout the world and has negative impact on patient's quality of life. There is no cure and to date several drugs have been used for its symptomatic treatment, including antidepressants and antiepileptics. Neurotec is a herbal medicine (combination of wild star anise, nettle and tansy) that can be potentially effective in the treatment of this disorder. Proposed mechanisms include its effects on increasing nerve conduction velocity and repairing peripheral nerves.
Methods: In a single-blind randomized clinical trial from April to September 2018 in Kermanshah of patients referred to Taleghani Hospital Clinic, 100 diabetic patients with sensory complaints, were randomly divided into two groups. The first group received 100 to 300 mg gabapentin (a well-known effective antiepileptic drug) daily and the second group received 100 mg Neurotec daily. At the beginning of the study and at the weeks of 6 and 12, patients were evaluated with DN4 questionnaire and the visual analog scale (VAS) for severity of sensory symptoms including paresthesia and numbness and the results were compared and analyzed. In each serial visit, possible drug side effects were asked from patients and recorded.
Results: Neurotec reduced the feeling of coldness, pain, paresthesia and numbness VAS and DN4 scores (P of 0.01,0.05, 0.05, 0.05, 0.001, 0.05 respectively). Neurotec showed a significant advantage over gabapentin in reducing pain intensity and in other parameters the difference between the two groups was not significant. The only significant complication of Neurotec was dyspepsia that could be minimal in patients who receive the drug after a meal. Conversely in the gabapentin group, dizziness, drowsiness, and vertigo were significantly more common (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Neurotec can be useful for sensory symptoms of diabetic neuropathy. Its effect on symptomatic therapy is comparable to gabapentin or even better for painful diabetic neuropathies. Its proposed mechanism in neuronal repair needs to be evaluated and can be a potential advantage over symptomatic therapies. Neurotic has no serious side effects.

The Efficacy of pregabalin and gabapentin in managing headache following subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review
Mohammad Saadatnia , Faezeh Sharifi, Fariborz Khoroush,
Volume 83, Issue 8 (11-2025)
Abstract
Background: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a life-threatening emergency condition often accompanied by severe, sudden-onset headache. The main causes are head trauma and aneurysm rupture. Pain management in these patients remains challenging, typically requiring opioids which carry significant adverse effects. As anti-neuropathic agents, gabapentin and pregabalin may serve as suitable alternatives to opioids. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin and pregabalin in managing SAH-associated headaches.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted comprehensive searches in PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and EMBASE through May 2025. Key search terms included "Gabapentin," "Pregabalin," "Subarachnoid Hemorrhage," and "Headache." After initial screening, we selected English or Persian-language articles investigating these medications' effects on SAH-related headache. After removal of duplicates and screening, four eligible studies (including randomized controlled trials and cohort studies) were included for final analysis. Data on study type, sample size, type of interventions, headache management-related outcomes, as well as safety and tolerability profiles were extracted.
Results: Pregabalin demonstrated significant efficacy, showing a statistically significant reduction in pain intensity compared to placebo before anesthesia induction (P≤0.004) and up to 24 hours post-operatively (P=0.007). Additionally, patients receiving pregabalin required significantly fewer rescue analgesics (P≤0.005). In contrast, gabapentin did not produce a statistically significant reduction in pain intensity or morphine equivalent requirements compared to placebo, although a non-significant trend toward decreased pain was observed. Safety profiles were favorable for both medications; no serious adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were reported.
Conclusion: Pregabalin appears to be an effective, safe, and well-tolerated option for managing SAH-related headache, significantly reducing both pain intensity and opioid requirements. Current evidence for gabapentin remains limited and inconclusive, warranting further large-scale, randomized controlled trials to confirm its potential role in this setting.

 

Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb