Majid Vatankhah Tarbebar , Saeid Kashani, Milad Mohammadi , Zohreh Nik Eghbali, Mehrdad Malekshoar,
Volume 83, Issue 6 (September 2025)
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for treating gallbladder diseases; however, it is associated with physiological challenges from pneumoperitoneum and specific patient positioning. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may mitigate these effects, but the optimal level remains uncertain. This study compared the impact of three PEEP levels on respiratory performance and hemodynamic stability during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods: This randomized double-blind clinical trial was conducted at Shahid Mohammadi Hospital, Bandar Abbas, Iran, from August 2023 to February 2024. A total of 75 adult patients aged 18-70 years with ASA class I-II scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assigned to three groups (n=25 each): PEEP 0 cmH₂O (control), PEEP 5 cmH₂O, and PEEP 7 cmH₂O. Standardized general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation with tidal volumes of 6-8 mL/kg were applied. Hemodynamic variables (mean arterial pressure, heart rate) and respiratory parameters (SpO₂, EtCO₂) were recorded before intubation, during intubation, and at 15, 30, and 60 minutes post-intubation, as well as in the recovery room. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed 30 minutes after intubation. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and chi-square tests with a significance level of 0.05.
Results: The mean age of patients was 41.89±11.39 years, and baseline demographic variables showed no significant differences among groups. Oxygen saturation remained above 94% across all time points without intergroup differences. EtCO₂ values differed significantly at 30 minutes (P=0.04) and 60 minutes (P=0.01), with the highest levels observed in the PEEP 7 group and the lowest in the PEEP 5 group. Although mean arterial pressure and heart rate did not show statistically significant variation among groups, the PEEP 7 group demonstrated the smallest postoperative decline in blood pressure.
Conclusion: A PEEP level of 5 cmH₂O offers the most favorable balance between maintaining oxygenation, supporting effective ventilation, and preserving hemodynamic stability during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This level can be recommended as a safe and optimal ventilation strategy.
Mohammad Sadegh Sanie Jahromi , Reza Ashrafzadeh, Ahmad Rastgarian, Navid Kalani , Mohammad Hasan Damshenas,
Volume 83, Issue 6 (September 2025)
Abstract
Background: In general anesthesia, anesthetic agents are administered by inhalation or intravenously, leading to loss of consciousness, immobility, analgesia, and amnesia. In spinal anesthesia, injection of a local anesthetic into the intrathecal space causes sensory and motor block. The aim of this study was to compare the volume of bleeding during cesarean section under general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia.
Methods: This study is a cross-sectional prospective study. The gauzes used were weighed before the operation and bloody gauzes were weighed after the operation. The difference between the weight of bloody and dry gauzes was recorded as the volume of bleeding. This volume was then added to the volume of blood in the suction chamber and the final bleeding volume was estimated.
Results: 70 patients who were candidates for cesarean section were included in the study. The mean age of the patients included in the study was 24.82±4.98 and their mean weight was 77.11±8.97. The mean hemoglobin in the spinal anesthesia group was 91.12±39. Volume of bleeding during cesarean section by spinal anesthesia was significantly less than general anesthesia (P=0.001). Also, the visual estimation of bleeding in spinal anesthesia was significantly lower than general anesthesia (P<0.001). In this study, there was no significant difference between heart rate, systolic and diastolic pressure before and during surgery, and the first- and fifth-minute Apgar scores between the two groups of general and spinal anesthesia.
Conclusion: We found in this study that the volume of bleeding during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia is less than general anesthesia. It is suggested that in future studies, other methods of estimating bleeding such as postoperative hemoglobin reduction, dilution method, atomic absorption spectroscopy and photometry be used. Also, a comparison should be made between the three groups of general, spinal and epidural anesthesia, and the volume of bleeding in each should be checked and the best anesthesia method should be selected for cesarean section.
