Showing 10 results for Fentanyl
Shoeibi G, Akbari Nejad M, Hosein Gholizadeh A,
Volume 62, Issue 2 (5-2004)
Abstract
Background: Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) compared to general anesthesia has some pits and falls. Many drugs have been employed for this anesthesia. Propofol is accounted as the last advent anesthetic drug. It belongs to alkyl phenol families and has been accounted one of the best choices for the continuous infusion. Invention of midazolam as the first water soluble benzodiazepine was also an important event in anesthesia and it can be used as continuous infusion for the anesthesia.
Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, alfentanyl plus propofol or midazolam were used for TIVA anesthesia in 60 female patients undergoing Dilatation and Curettage (D&C) in Dr.Shariati hospital in March 2002 till March 2003. They were allocated reandomly in two group of alfentanyl plus propofol (propofol group) or alfentanyl plus midazolam (midazolam group)
Results: There was no significant difference in mean of age between propofol group and midazolam group (P>0.05), also There was no significant difference in preanesthesia condition such as blood pressure and heart rate between propofol group and midazolam group (p>0.05). After induction of anesthesia there was a gross blood pressure decrease in both group that it was greater in midazolam group (85 mmHg versus 73 mmHg, P<0.05 ) following this, there was an increase in heart rate in both groups that it was modest in propofol group (98 Beat/Sec versus 118 Beat/Sec, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in mean infused alfentanyl (P>0.05) also there was just one naloxane injection in midazolam group that have no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). Recovery room stay was significantly lower in propofol group (25 minutes versus 39 minutes, P<0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study was similar to Vuyk et.al.In their study there was a significant lower recovery time estimated by psychomotor reflexes and there was significant lower drowsiness, place and time orientation time compared to midazolam group. Finally according to the results of this study it can be resulted that TIVA with propofol is more suitable than midazolam and it can lower hospitalization time and cost. In future studies using other narcotics and other narcotics-anesthetic compounds with various dose can be mentioned.
Raji B, Taheri F, Osia Sh,
Volume 65, Issue 6 (9-2007)
Abstract
Background: Spinal anesthesia can be associated with hemodynamic changes and some other complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding fentanyl to lidocaine on the spinal anesthesia time and its complications for cesarean section.
Methods: Sixty pregnant women with gestational age of 37- 42 weeks and ASA physical status I and II undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were enrolled in a randomized double blinded clinical trial. They were randomly allocated to receive spinal anesthesia with lidocaine-normal saline (LS: 75 mg lidocaine 5% with 0.3 ml normal saline) lidocaine-fentanyl (LF) group (75 mg lidocaine 5% with 50 μg fentanyl). The duration of initiation of sensory block to achieve T4 level, time to return of sensory level to T12, time to first analgesic request, ephedrine requirement, nausea and vomiting during and after the surgery, pruritus, respirator depression, headache and apgar score of the new born at 1st and 5th minutes were assessed.
Results: There was no significant difference between time to achieve T4 level, ephedrine dose, post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus and headache in study groups. Time to return of sensory level to T12 was significantly longer in LF group (152.6±14.7 vs. 66.2±11.2 min, P=0.0009). Time to first analgesic request was also longer in LF group (164.2±20.8 vs. 68.1±11.3 min, P=0.0009). The incidence of nausea and vomiting during surgery was significantly more in LF group (20% vs. 0%, P=0.023). No case of respiratory depression was observed in groups.The 1st and 5th minute's apgar score were comparable between groups and were between 7 and 10.
Conclusions: Addition of fentanyl to intrathecal lidocaine in patients undergoing elective cesarean section results in increasing of the block duration and time to first analgesic request without significant maternal or neonatal side-effects, without effect on 1st and 5th minutes apgar score with increasing the incidence of during surgery nausea and vomiting.
Amiri Hr, Makarem J, Noyan Ashraf Ma,
Volume 67, Issue 3 (6-2009)
Abstract
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-GB
X-NONE
AR-SA
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
Background: Bispectral index (BIS
index) shows the depth of anesthesia. The effects of drugs on BIS and amnesia are different. This study was performed to evaluate the
association between two different sedative regimens on BIS
and amnesia.
Methods: In this clinical trial, 60 patients who needed elective orthopedic surgery under regional
anesthesia with intravenous sedation were elected. Patients divided in two
equal groups based on sedation protocol by block randomization method:
midazolam plus fentanyl group (MF group) or propofol group (P group). Dose of sedative drugs were adjusted according to clinical
findings of sedation. Depth of sedation in all patients, preserved in four
based on modified Ramsey Sedation Score. Patients questioned about spontaneous
recall after full awakening in recovery room. Recall of any event during
operation considered as failed amnesia. Correlation of BIS
index with recall was measured in two different groups separately.
Results: The frequency of recall was 2 (6.7%) in P
group and 10 (33.3%) in MF
group (p=0.01). The mean± SD
of BIS in P group was 76±5 (68-91) and in MF group was 93.4±5 (77-98) (p<0.001). The difference of BIS in patients without amnesia (p=0.019)
and with amnesia (p<0.001) in two groups were significant, respectively. No
delay in recovery was observed.
Conclusion: Although the Modified Ramsey Sedation Score and
clinical sedation indices were the same, but BIS in
patients varied in a wide range. Hypnotic drug was a main determinant of BIS
score and amnesia.
Khalili Gh, Sajedi P, Yousef Zadeghan S,
Volume 70, Issue 9 (12-2012)
Abstract
Background: Control of intracranial pressure (ICP) before, during and after neurosurgical operations is crucially important. Therefore, trying different methods and drug combinations to attain this goal is an ongoing effort in anesthesiology. In this study we compared two combinations of a narcotic agent with propofol in neurosurgical operations to control intracranial pressure.
Methods: In this prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial, we enrolled 34 patients with supratentorial brain tumors who were candidates for craniotomy in Alzahra Hospital in Isfahan, Iran from April 2008 to April 2009. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 17, in whom the first and the second group, respectively, received a combination of "propofol and fentanyl" and a combination of "propofol and remifentanyl" as maintenance of anesthesia. The hemodynamic status, ICP during the surgery, and post-surgical complications in recovery unit were observed for and registered in a questionnaire.
Results: Hemodynamic status was similar in both groups and they did not differ in recovery complications except for pain which was more prevalent in remifentanil group (P<0.03). Although the patients in fentanyl group better responded to the drug for lowering ICP than remifentanyl group, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: There is no difference between these two anesthetic agent combinations and both could be useful in the anesthesia of neurosurgical operations. However combination of propofol and fentanyl seem to be superior because of more pain relief and a smoother recovery period.
Mehdi Sanatkar , Mehrdad Goudarzi ,
Volume 77, Issue 3 (6-2019)
Abstract
Background: Cataract is one of the most common eye diseases especially in children and adolescents in two age ranges, and many of these patients need to surgery throughout life. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of midazolam-ketamine and midazolam-fentanyl for sedation in adult cataract surgery.
Methods: In this study, which was a case-control study, 80 patients were referred to Farabi Hospital in Tehran from November to December 2018 for cataract surgery and underwent surgery. The patients were divided into two groups (n=40). In this study the method of using midazolam-ketamine (ketamine group) was compared with the combination of midazolam-fentanyl (fentanyl group). The hemodynamic variables such as blood pressure and heart rate before surgery were measured and then measured every 5 minutes during operation and were recorded. In addition to hemodynamic variables, other variables such as agitation, surgeon satisfaction, recovery nurse satisfaction, degree of oxygen saturation during surgery, and nausea and vomiting were compared between the two groups.
Results: In this study, 18 patients (45%) of fentanyl group and 17 patients (42.5%) of ketamine group were female. Patients in the two groups had similar demographic distribution before surgery. In this study about blood pressure after surgery, from 80 patients, 22 cases had blood pressure below 119.79 mmHg, of which 3 (13.6%) cases were in ketamine group and 19 cases (86.4%) in fentanyl group. In general, 7.5% of ketamine group and 47.5% of fentanyl group had a blood pressure lower than 119.79 mmHg. Hemodynamic changes and hypotension after sedation was more in fentanyl group. Two groups did not differ in terms of heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation during surgery, surgeon satisfaction during surgery, and postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Conclusion: Administration of ketamine-midazolam versus fentanyl-midazolam in patients who underwent cataract surgery by sedation led to more stable hemodynamic variables intraoperatively and other side effects such as heart rate, oxygen saturation, surgeon satisfaction, nausea and vomiting were similar between two groups.
Mehdi Sanatkar , Mehrdad Goudarzi , Ebrahim Espahbodi ,
Volume 78, Issue 3 (6-2020)
Abstract
Background: Cataract is one of the most common eye diseases especially in elderly patients and most of these patients require surgery. In the process of sedation, different drugs are used, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Dexmedetomidine is one of the drugs that has recently received special attention for sedation. In this study, we compared the drug combination of dexmedetomidine-fentanyl with midazolam-fentanyl in cataract surgery.
Methods: In a case-control study, the patients who underwent cataract surgery by a surgeon with topical anesthesia and sedation techniques were included in the target group. Seventy patients were divided into two groups of 35 according to a random number table. One group received dexmedetomidine-fentanyl (dexmedetomidine group) and the other received midazolam-fentanyl (midazolam group). Age, sex, weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, patient sedation, surgeon satisfaction, recovery nurse satisfaction, and postoperative nausea and vomiting were compared between the two groups. The study was performed in the Farabi Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from October to November 2019.
Results: Patients in the two groups were similar in age, sex, weight, and preoperative hemodynamic variables. There was no significant difference in preoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure between the two groups (P=0.150). However, those who received dexmedetomidine had significantly lower intraoperative heart rate (P<0.001). The difference in postoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as postoperative heart rate was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in postoperative sedation (P=0.93). The surgeon’s satisfaction was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.17). Also, the rate of recovery nurse satisfaction was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.21). The incidence of nausea and vomiting was similar in both groups (P=1.00).
Conclusion: Sedation with dexmedetomidine decreases blood pressure and heart rate. Therefore, it is recommended to use dexmedetomidine more cautiously in patients with unstable hemodynamics and especially in short surgical procedures.
Hamidreza Shetabi, Khosrow Naghibi , Alireza Peyman, Shima Taghizadeh,
Volume 79, Issue 6 (9-2021)
Abstract
Background: The risk of anesthesia increases with age, so it is necessary to choose a safe and effective method. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of intranasal fentanyl with intravenous fentanyl in patients undergoing cataract surgery.
Methods: This study was a triple-blind prospective randomized clinical trial (The patient, physician, and data analyzer were unaware of the patient grouping). The study was performed from April 2017 to March 2019 in Feyz Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. 90 patients over 18 years of age who were candidates for cataract surgery were included in the study and were divided in two groups receiving intravenous fentanyl (IVF) or intranasal fentanyl (INF). The dose of fentanyl in both groups was 1.5 μg/kg with a maximum of 100 μg. In the IVF group, 1 ml of normal saline was dripped into each nasal passage 10 minutes before surgery and intravenously fentanyl was injected 2 minutes before surgery. In the INF group, 1 ml of fentanyl was administered into each nostril 10 minutes before surgery and 2 ml of saline was administered intravenously two minutes before surgery.
|
Results: In this study, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean heart rate (P=0.762), mean arterial blood oxygen saturation (P=0.262), mean systolic blood pressure (P=0.264), mean arterial blood pressure (0.462), satisfaction rate Patient (P=0.231), duration of surgery (P=0.612) and pain intensity (P=0.87). But in the intravenous fentanyl group (IVF), the level of sedation (P=0.002) and the level of surgeon satisfaction (P<0.001) were higher than intranasal fentanyl group (INF). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of side effects (P=0.171) and surgery time (P=0.612). The mean VAS was not significantly different between the two groups.
Conclusion: The study showed that intranasal administration of fentanyl compared with intravenous administration of fentanyl provided similar sedation and cardiovascular response. Intranasal administration of fentanyl is a non-invasive, safe and effective method, that is easy to use and can be a viable alternative to intravenous administration.
|
Seyedeh Roya Mousavi , Parvaneh Ebrahimzadeh, Sepideh Yazdanpanah , Nasim Alsadat Mousavi, Mansour Deylami ,
Volume 82, Issue 4 (7-2024)
Abstract
Background: Today, addiction is a major problem in modern society, which affects the management of patients during anesthesia. In patients with long-term use of opioids, higher doses of opioids are needed to create analgesia and control pain during and after surgery. Also, addicted patients have more resistance to local anesthetic drugs when they are used to perform peripheral and central nerve blocks. Therefore, many drugs are added to local anesthetics to enhance their analgesic properties, one of the most common of which is narcotic compounds. Itching caused by opium may be generalized and often occurs shortly after injection. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the amount of itching caused by intrathecal injection of fentanyl in opium addicts who undergo elective orthopedic surgeries of the lower limbs with spinal anesthesia. have been taken, designed and established.
Methods: This study was a double-blind clinical trial conducted on 68 patients who were candidates for elective lower limb orthopedic surgeries under spinal anesthesia and referred to 5 Azar Hospital in Gorgan in 2023. Patients were divided into two groups using random numbers table, Intervention (a group of addicted patients who received intrathecal marcaine together with fentanyl for spinal anesthesia) and control (a group of addicted patients who received only intrathecal marcaine for spinal anesthesia). Pruritus, nausea and vomiting were measured in both groups. Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics and inferential statistical tests.
|
Results: In terms of age, gender, and BMI, there was no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups. The incidence of itching was zero in the bupivacaine group and 17.6% in the fentanyl and bupivacaine group, of which 3% required anti-itch medication for treatment.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that due to the low incidence of pruritus in the group using fentanyl along with bupivacaine, its use is beneficial in people with drug addiction.
|
Navid Kalani , Hasan Zabetian, Shahram Shafa, Erfaneh Alirezai, Fatemeh Eftekharian, Reza Sahraei ,
Volume 82, Issue 4 (7-2024)
Abstract
Background: Recently, epinephrine is used to increase the depth and duration of local anesthetic pain, and it is widely used topically to reduce local anesthetic release and reduce bleeding caused by surgery.
Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial on 30 patients aged 18 to 85 years undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery referred to Peymaniyeh Hospital in Jahrom from September to December 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups, A (epinephrine+fentanyl+bupivacaine) and B (bupivacaine+fentanyl). Systolic blood pressure, diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, arterial blood oxygen saturation percentage, and pulse rate were measured and recorded before drug administration, before spinal anesthesia, after anesthesia, and then every half hour until the end of surgery (15, 45, 30, 60, 75, 90, 120) and during recovery. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 21 software and descriptive (mean, standard deviation) and inferential statistics (t-test, chi-square, Mann-Whitney, Friedman) at a significance level of P<0.05.
|
Results: Thirty patients aged 18 to 85 years (in two groups of 15) with anesthesia class I and II undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery were evaluated. The study groups are matched in terms of age and gender variables. There was no significant difference in mean systolic, diastolic, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate before and after anesthesia, 15, 45, 30, 60, 75, 90, and 120 minutes after drug injection, and at entry and exit from recovery between the Epinephrine+Fentanyl+Bupivacaine and Fentanyl+Bupivacaine groups. There was a significant difference in mean O2SAT before anesthesia, 15, 30, and 75 minutes after drug injection between the epinephrine+fentanyl+bupivacaine and fentanyl+ bupivacaine groups (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The use of the combination of epinephrine+fentanyl+intrathecal bupivacaine compared to the combination of fentanyl+bupivacaine did not have a significant difference in the studied variables of patients' vital signs.
|
Majid Karimifard, Ashkan Sabouri, Khaled Rahmani , Mohammad Azad Majedi, Behzad Ahsan ,
Volume 83, Issue 4 (7-2025)
Abstract
Background: Patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at higher risk for delirium. The present study aimed to compare the frequency of delirium in patients requiring anesthesia receiving the Presedex and fentanyl regimen with the midazolam and fentanyl regimen in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods: This historical cohort study was conducted on all patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit of Kowsar Hospital in sanandaj from May 2018 to December 2024 as a census with a sample size of 40 people in each group. Delirium and restlessness were assessed based on RASS criteria and the GCS scale was used to assess the level of consciousness of the patients. The data were entered into SPSS 24 software and a significance level of less than 5% was considered.
Results: The average age of the patients in Perdex, fentanyl, midazolam, and fentanyl regimens was 41.52 and 34.05 years, respectively. 53(66.3%) patients were male and the rest were female. The GCS score in the Presdex and Fentanyl group was 14(35%) and the Midazolam and Fentanyl group was 4(10%) with a level of consciousness above 7. The RASS score (5 patients in the Presdex and fentanyl group (12.5%) and the midazolam and fentanyl group (36 patients in the midazolam and fentanyl group (90%) had an anxiety score of zero or higher) was 0. The frequency of delirium based on CAM-ICU criteria in the Presdex and fentanyl group was 27(67.5%) mild delirium and 13(32.5%) moderate delirium, but in the midazolam and fentanyl group, 6(15%) mild delirium, 24(60%) moderate delirium, and 10(25%) severe delirium were present, and this difference was significant in the results of level of consciousness and restlessness and incidence of delirium (P=0.000).
Conclusion: The results showed that the use of Presedex and fentanyl would be more effective in reducing the incidence of delirium, and the use of this drug could be effective.
