Showing 7 results for Hearing Loss
Karimi Yazdi A, Sadeghi M, Nadimi Tehrani A, Naraghi M, Dashti Khidaki Gh A, Sabeti K,
Volume 62, Issue 1 (4-2004)
Abstract
Background: The damaging effect of exposure to loud noise on the structures of internal ear has been studied from many years ago. The effect of drill-generated noise on the non-operated ear is one of the problems that are less discussed. This study aims to evaluate the hearing loss that occurs in the non-operated ear in patients who undergo mastoidectomy by use of PTA (pure tone audiometery) and DPOAE (distortion product otoacoustic emission).
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive- analytic study, 49 patients who underwent mastoidectomy in Amir-Alam and Iman Khomeini hospitals, were evaluated for noise trauma generated by drilling on the non-operated ear. Patients were between 9-55 years old (mean age= 29) and they consisted of 25 males and 24 females. The patient's preoperative state were measured by PTA and DPOAE on the opposite ear also the postoperative state were re-evaluated by PTA and DPOAE.
Results: As a result, in 4 cases a significant change in PTA thresholds were observed, while two of them showed recovery after one month. Seven cases showed significant change in DPOAE amplitudes, of whom five cases recovered later.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the drill-induced hearing loss on the non-operated ear occurs in a few patients and it is often reversible.
M Amiridavan, S.m Sonbolestan, S.a Kholvvat, Sh Nemati ,
Volume 64, Issue 1 (3-2006)
Abstract
Background and Aim: Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL) is an emergency situation, and is one of the most controversial subjects in domain of otolaryngology. In this article, we have analyzed some Epidemiologic Characteristics, clinical features, audiological Characteristics, and other findings in routine serological tests and MRI of 48 cases with SSNHL ,who came or were referred to us in the past 2 years. Study design: Cross sectional.
Materials and Methods: In 48 patients with chief complaint of SSNHL, from June 2003 to Feb. 2005, who were admitted in clinic of otolaryngology- in Kashani Hospital -Isfahan- Iran, physical examination and history taking, audiological evaluation, MRI,and serological tests were performed in a similar way , and data were analyzed by SPSS software.
Results: From 48 cases(M:28 ,F:20) with mean age of 40.9(+/-15.9) years, left ear was involved in 26 cases (54.1%) ,and right ear in 19 cases (39.5%) ,and in 3 cases (6.3%),both sides were involved. The severity of hearing loss was “subjectively” HIGH in 78% of patients, and the mean threshold of hearing had been calculated as 69 dB. The most common pattern in pure tone audiometry curves ,was ‘flat pattern’(75%) ,and then ,’down sloping pattern’(16%).The most adjunctive clinical symptom was “tinnitus”(in 78.7%), and 40% of patients had “true vertigo”. 44.4% of our patients had some evidences of upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) during recent 2 weeks. Positive family history, smoking, alcohol intake ,oral contraceptive and ototoxic drugs consumption were uncommon. 24% of cases (11 of 39) had increased ESR, and 100% of 39 patients had negative VDRL. Diabetes mellitus was the most common underlying disease (in 6 cases).From 20 patients ,who were succeeded to perform brain and ear MRI, 2 cases had tumor in internal auditory canal and cerebellopontine angle.
Conclusion: SSNHL has some limitations in being studied histopathologically or in the form of clinical trials, and in nearly all of its aspects there are some mysteries to be cleared. Our ‘Iranian’ patients demonstrated some special characteristics.
Nemati Sh, Amiridavan M, Jamshidi M, Saberi A, Majlesi A,
Volume 65, Issue 4 (7-2007)
Abstract
Background: Sudden sensorinueural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a baffling condition for patients, and its etiology, audiologic characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment are still controversial.
Methods: In this prospective study, we performed pure tone audiometry (PTA), impedance acoustics (IA), auditory brainstem responses (ABR), otoacoustic emissions (OAE), and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) before beginning treatment for 53 patients with SSNHL. We then entered each patient, randomly and alternately, in one of two treatment groups: oral steroids + acyclovir vs. intravenous urographin.
Results: In 22 (41.5%) of the 53 patients (22 female, 31 male), we found negative or no signal to noise ratio and overall correlation in TEOAE. Furthermore, 26 cases (49%) had positive overall correlations less than 50%, and five cases (4.4%) had overall correlations >50%. Although 15 cases (28.3%) responded well, 20 cases (37.7%) showed only a partial response, and 18 cases (33.9%) had poor or no response to our treatment. The mean value for overall correlation in the three subgroups of patients (no response, partial response, and complete response) was -3.5% (±1/16%), + 11% (±1.99%), and +36.6% (±3.07%) respectively (P = 0.01). From 52 cases, 20 had no reproducible wave in ABR (38.5%), three cases had abnormal ABR with normal OAE, all of which responded completely to treatments. Thirteen cases had abnormal ABR and OAE, none of which responded to treatment, and six cases had normal ABR with abnormal OAE, which often responded to treatment.
Conclusions: ABR and OAE may be useful in the diagnosis of SSNHL and determining the site of such lesions as ischemia or neuropathy. The overall correlation (and S/N ratio) in TEOAE is a valuable prognostic factor in SSNHL.
Khorsandi M T, Mohammadi M, Motasaddi Zarandy M, Mandegar M H, Yoosefnia M A, Sabetazad B,
Volume 65, Issue 7 (10-2007)
Abstract
Background: Hearing is one of the most significant senses There fore, any defect can be frightening. The incidence of sever hearing loss following coronary artery bypass surgery has been estimated as one per thousand. This Prospective study carried out to determine hearing effects of coronary artery bypass surgery.
Methods: age, audiometric changes before and after surgery (hearing levels at multiple frequencies, speech reception threshold and speech discrimination score), minimum blood pressure during the operation, and the time on bypass, measured on One hundred consecutive patients who candidate for coronary artery bypass surgery and the results analysed.
Results: One hundred patients completed the tests. Based on hearing changes found on pre- and post-operative tests, the patients were divided into 3 groups: Those with no change (47 patients) according to their audiometric results those with slight changes ≤10 db (43 patients) and those having average deficits of more than 10 db (10 patients). All the patients were male. None of the patients had complete or severe sensorineural hearing loss. The third group had more prolonged pumping duration when compared with the others groups (p=0.002). Furthermore, 90 percent of patients with a sensorineural hearing loss more than 10 db had diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia as risk factors.
Conclusion: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is a sequela in patients who undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery however, it was usually mild and asymptomatic. Pumping time during the operation is a significant factor in occurring of this complication. With proper treatment of underlying diseases and eliminating the risk factors with improvement of our cardiopulmonary pumps we probably can get better hearing results.
Ghanaati H, Aghaee S, Salehianzandi N, Shakiba M,
Volume 65, Issue 14 (3-2008)
Abstract
Background: Among patients who have sensorineural hearing loss of unknown etiology,
diabetes is one of the diseases to be routinely investigated. The relationship between
diabetes mellitus and hearing loss is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to
examine the prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss in patients with insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus (IDDM) compared to control group.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study pure tone audiometry (PTA) and speech audiometry
was performed in 62 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), aged under
40 years, and in 62 randomly selected age-matched non-diabetic control subjects. Subjects
with otological and other metabolic diseases were excluded from the study. We applied the
SPSS.10 statistical analysis software Chi-square and student’s test.
Results: Statistical analysis showed that the hearing of the diabetic patients were
significantly worsen than the control subjects. The hearing level tended to be worsen in the
diabetic patients than that in control subjects, but the differences were statistically
significant only at frequencies of 250,500, 4000 and 8000 Hz (p<0.05). There wasn’t
statistical significant difference between sex in two study groups (p>0.05). The mean
duration of diabetes was no statistically significant with hearing loss (p>0.05). The
frequency of complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy in the
diabetic groups had no correlation with speech threshold (p>0.05). There were no
significant differences between speech reception threshold, speech discrimination score
and acoustic reflex in two groups.
Conclusions: We conclude that type I diabetes mellitus can cause sensorineural hearing
loss.
Ali Zamani, Alireza Karimi, Mohsen Naseri, Elaheh Amini, Mohammad Milani, Amir Arvin Sazgar, Seyed Mousa Sadr Hosseini, Mohammad Sadeghi Hassan Abadi, Fatemeh Nayeri, Firouzeh Nili, Mamak Shariat, Mostafa Vasigh, Fariba Nasaj, Fatemeh Zamani, Narges Zamani,
Volume 68, Issue 1 (4-2010)
Abstract
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
AR-SA
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
Background: American pediatric Association proposes to
screen all neonates with Oto-Acoustic Emission (OAE). In developing countries, because of several limitations,
health policy makers recommend to screen only in high risk patients. This study is performed with the aim to screen
hearing loss in 950 high risk newborns hospitalized in hospitals
affiliated to Tehran University using the OAE test.
Methods: A total of 950 neonates hospitalized in the Neonatal and NICU wards of
Vali-e-Asr, Shariati, Medical Center and Bahrami Hospitals during the years 2004-2006 who
showed at least one risk factor using TEOAE hearing test were enrolled into this cross-sectional
descriptive analytical study and were diagnosed with mild deafness and total
deafness. Blood exchange due to hyperbillirubinemia, septicemia, congenital
heart disease, the fifth minute apgar scores below six, PROM more than six hours, epilepsia, need to NICU more than five hours, pneumonia and Oto-Toxic drugs
were considered as risk factors. Data was past medical history, current
disease, admission cause, sign & symptoms and complications of disease.
Results: Multivariate logistic regression and paired t-test
showed that blood exchange, low birth weight and low first minute Apgar scores
had the highest independent risk for hearing loss among newborn.
Conclusion: Despite of the low prevalence of neonatal hearing loss,
screening of hearing loss at early stages is important.
Ahmad Joneidi Jafari , Ebrahim Sahebdel , Asghar Hajipour , Mihan Jafari Javid , Seyed Mohammad Mireskandari , Kasra Karvandian , Afshin Jafarzadeh , Shahram Samadi ,
Volume 71, Issue 11 (2-2014)
Abstract
Background: Surgeons and anesthesiologists working in orthopedic operating theatres are exposed to significant noise pollution due to the use of powered instruments. This may carry a risk of noise-induced hearing loss. The present study was designed to quantify the noise pollution experienced by anesthesiologists at Imam Khomeini Hospital which is one of the largest Iranian hospitals.
Methods: Prior to beginning of any operation a sound level meter was worn by the anesthesiologist at the level of chest pocket. Basal sound level was recorded. All changes in the sound level of 25 operation rooms and two related pass ways were recorded and the mean sound level along with maximum sound level were noted. These data were analyzed by SPSS version 17. For comparing the mean values, the One way ANOVA and Post-Hoc analysis was used. Noise exposures were compared with occupational health guidelines.
Results: Our comparative data showed that orthopedic operation room had the highest level of noise, indicating that orthopedic operation room is significantly suffered by the most types of noise with the P value of 0.002. This is contrast to the sound levels at the other operation rooms which were at same range and were not significantly different. Comparison of the maximum sound level between these 27 places showed that orthopedic and one of general surgery room had top two maximum sound levels.
Conclusion: Overall total noise dose during all types of surgeries was measured as twice of permitted dose and also orthopedic and general operation rooms experience brief periods of noise exposure in excess.
