Search published articles


Showing 3 results for Laser Therapy
The comparison between effects of two general anesthesia techniques Intermittent apenic technique and continuous controlled ventilation in upper airway Laser therapy
Taheri A, Hajimohamadi F, Khagavy Mr ,
Volume 60, Issue 6 (9-2002)
Abstract

Introduction: Laser beam due to finest of incision and reduction of postoperative complication, facilitates airway surgery, but at the same time it increases the danger or firing and the airway management and protection becomes difficult during anesthesia. In this study, two general anesthesia methods (Intermittent Apneic Technique And Continuous Controlled Ventilation With Enveloped Endotracheal Tube) have been compared with each other mater.

Materials and methods: two groups, each consist of 25 patients 10 to 60 years old, and ASA I-II class and below 100kg weight who have been candidate for laser therapy, were given two mentioned methods of anesthesia. All patients were suffering from subglotic stenosis, vocal cord nodules, papillomatosis and oropharyngeal obstruction. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia, and monitoring during surgery (EGG, PETCO2, SaPo2, BP, PR) in both groups were the same.

Results: Homodynamic stability in the both groups were the same and there was no hypoxia and dysrhythmia. In apneic technique group, most of the surgeries needed 2-3 time of apnea, and each apnea duration was 2-4 minutes, without any hypercaphic (Peteco 2>47 mmHg) and hypoxic (Spo2<90 percent) state and duration of laser surgery was about 9-10 minutes. More satisfaction was gained with apneic technique because of having a better surgery filed. All the patients had no recall at the end of anesthesia and patietn's expenses were much lower with no danger of firing.

Conclusion: It has been concluded that intermittent apneic technique in upper airway laser therapy is a better technique of anesthesia.


Low Level Laser Therapy And Exercise Therapy In Treatment Of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Mehrdad R, Esmaeili Javid G, Hasan Zadeh H, Sotoodeh Manesh A, Ghasemi M,
Volume 63, Issue 4 (7-2005)
Abstract
Background: This study was designed to compare low-level laser therapy (LLLT) + exercise therapy with LLLT alone and exercise therapy alone, and to determine whether laser therapy is a useful treatment modality for chronic low back pain (LBP).
Materials and Methods: This study was a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. Patients with chronic LBP for at least 12 weeks were included. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ), Schober test, flexion, extension and lateral bending were used to evaluate back pain, disability score and lumbar range of motion. Irradiation was performed with GaAlAs (=810 nm, power density=226 mW/cm2) laser, two times a week, over a period of 6 weeks. Subjects were evaluated before the first treatment, at week 6 and 12 follow-up.
Results: The reduction in pain related to motion was significantly greater in the exercise + LLLT group compared with the exercise alone group (P = 0.004) but was not significant, compared with LLLT alone (P = 0.982). Disability score in LLLT + exercise therapy reduced more than the other two groups, and the difference with exercise alone group was significant (p = 0.03). Comparison of reduction of disability between LLLT alone and exercise therapy alone was not statistically significant. Improvement of lumbar range of motion in patients treated with LLLT + exercise therapy was better than the other two groups significantly, especially by Schober test and Flexion and lateral bending.
Conclusion: This study clearly shows that LLLT alone and especially LLLT combined with exercise can lead to better improvement in chronic LBP.
Short term effect of low-level laser therapy on tooth stability after orthodontic treatment
Batoolalsadat Mousavi Fard , Samaneh Sadeghi, Mehrdad Shahsavaripour,
Volume 80, Issue 9 (12-2022)
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this article was comparing the clinical effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in reducing relapse.
Methods: In this clinical trial study 14 patients (11 females and three males) who were under non-extraction treatment (MBT 022 slot) and at the finishing stage of orthodontic treatment at Orthodontics Department of Kerman Dental Faculty from April 2016 to June 2017 participated. Treatment time was two year and the patients at the finishing stage of orthodontic treatment were divided into two groups (RCT code IRCT2017053034061N1). Group 1 (study) were treated with a low-level Gallium aluminum-arsenide diode laser and group 2: control. The exclusion criteria involved patients who consumed medicine that interrupted bone metabolism and those with conditions for which laser therapy could be contraindicated. The laser apparatus emitted a wavelength of 810 nm about 50 seconds and operated with maximum power of 200 MW in continuous wave mode (200 mW, 50 seconds radiation to mesiolingual, mesiobuccal, distolingual and distobuccal surfaces, 35.7 J/cm2). An alginate impression was made from maxillary arch for all patients immediately, four, five and six months after removing the orthodontic archwire and braces and study casts were prepared. The little irregularity index of anterior maxillary arch was measured on the dental casts, with a 0.01 mm precision digital caliper. Intergroup comparisons were performed with Student's t-test and repeated measure ANOVA was perform to compare measurements among groups in different times. The significance level was considered at P<0.05.
Results: There was significant difference among the irregularity index at five and six months after orthodontic treatment between two groups (P<0.05). In the control group except between five and six months after treatment, there was significant difference in irregularity index. The relapse was higher immediately and after four months in the laser group compared to other sequences (P=0.0001).
Conclusion: Sample showed that Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a non invasive method for reducing relapse after orthodontic treatment.

Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb