Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Manipulation

Guity Mr, Ghaznavi Ar,
Volume 65, Issue 6 (9-2007)
Abstract

Background: Frozen shoulder is a debilitating disease characterized by pain and progressive loss of motion in shoulder secondary to fibrotic inflammation of the joint capsule. The incidence is 2% in the general population, mostly affecting women 40 to 70 years of age. Therapeutic measures include physiotherapy, shoulder manipulation, corticosteroid injection and arthroscopic release. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of manipulation under anesthesia with or without concomitant intra-articular injection of corticosteroid.

Methods: Twenty-six patients (21 females, 5 males) with the clinical diagnosis of idiopathic frozen shoulder were evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. The average age of the patients was 55.7 years. Twelve cases had diabetes mellitus, which is considered a strong predisposing factor and has a poor prognosis. Thirteen patients received intra-articular corticosteroid injection just before manipulation. The outcome was assessed by evaluating functional score (Constant scoring system) at the six-month follow-up.

Results: The average score before manipulation was 28.7 out of 100, which significantly improved to 84.8 at six months after the procedure (p<0.05). The results were slightly better in the group who received corticosteroid injection, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.1). The outcome in the diabetic group was less favorable than in the non-diabetic patients (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Manipulation under anesthesia is a very effective method of treatment for idiopathic frozen shoulder. Concomitant intra-articular injection of corticosteroid does not seem to improve significantly the final outcome. Diabetes mellitus can negatively affect the results of this treatment method.


Tannaz Ahadi , Nima Khaje , Bijan Forogh , Labaneh Janbazi, Masumeh Bagherzadehcham.m@iums.ac.ir,
Volume 80, Issue 4 (7-2022)
Abstract

Background: There are many conservative interventions to reduce the symptoms of coccydynia, but it is not clear which treatment can be more effective. The aim of this review study was to evaluate the types of conservative interventions and the effectiveness of each of them in reducing coccydynia symptoms.
Methods: This systematic review was carried out based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) instruction. A search for research studies published up to October 2021 was conducted in Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Firoozgar General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, using Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Knowledge and Cochrane without data constraints. The search was carried out in October 2021 and continued for seven months. The quality of the articles was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale (PEDro). All prospective randomized clinical trial studies in which participants suffered from coccydynia  and were treated with nonsurgical treatments  were included.
Results: 945 articles were found in the primary search of the databases. After eliminating 493 repetitive papers, 452 studies remained which were screened by the two researchers of this study in terms of the title and abstract. 40 studies were selected for full-text evaluation. Finally, 12 articles were included in the review study. Two papers used extracorporeal shockwave, two papers used impar ganglion block, three papers manual therapy, and four studies injection. The remaining four studies used iontophoresis with ketoprofen, biofeedback therapy, acupuncture, and physiotherapy with Kinesio taping.
Conclusion: Treatment with extracorporeal shock wave and impar ganglion block significantly improve tailbone pain and show more permanent effects on patients' symptoms. Manual therapies are mostly used in cases where the tailbone is stable. It seems that achieving the desired response requires more than six sessions, which is not pleasant for patients. Injections, especially those performed under fluoroscopic guidance, require high skill in addition to being unpleasant and painful. However, this procedure is done in one session, so there is no need for the next visit.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb