Tehran University Medical Journal

Background and Aim: Tuberculous pleural effusion occurs in 30% of patients with tuberculosis (TB). Rapid diagnosis of a tuberculous pleural effusion would greatly facilitate the management of many patients. The purpose of this study was to determine sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of clinical, laboratory, radiographic findings in patients with tuberculous pleural effusion.

Materials and Methods: The cross sectional study was performed between august 2002 and March 2004 at a referral teaching hospital. Major clinical, laboratory, and radiographic findings were evaluated in 88 cases of pleural effusion, 33 with confirmed TB pleural effusion (TBPE) and 55 with a diagnosis other than TB (NTBPE).

Results: The sensitivity of culture of pleural effusion and tissue were 3% and 9.1% respectively. The mean of adenosine deaminase (ADA) values in TBPE was 36.7 U/L (±18.72), and the mean in the NTBPE was 28.2 U/L (±17.0). Both the sensitivity and specificity of ADA estimation in diagnosing tuberculosis were 55%. The sensitivity of PCR was 3% with specificity of 12.7% (positive predictive value, 50% negative predictive value, 70%). Younger age (p<0.024), positive history of exposure to TB patient (p<0.02), and the combination of fever, weight loss and sweating (p<0.01), were associated with tuberculous pleural effusion. There were also significant association between Positive sputum smear (p<0.001), positive sputum culture (p<0.006), positive pleural biopsy (p<0.001), pleural LDH>200 (p<0.005), pleural lymphocytes>50% (p<0.015) and TBPE.

Conclusions: In our region with a high incidence of tuberculosis, the most frequent cause of exudative pleural effusion is tuberculosis. We suggest that the diagnostic planning of pleural effusion should be determined in each region with a view to the adoption of regionally optimized diagnostic and therapeutic facilities.

Background: The most common methods for screening of patients with probable ischemic heart disease are stress test and in special conditions are perfusion scan, so that their positive results was important indication of coronary angiography. Although, predictive value of perfusion scan has been considered, with regard to the impact of technical and specialized factors and according to the spread of this technique that has wrongly replaced the stress test, it is necessary to compare predictive value of this method with stress test in our country.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study, patients referred to Tehran Heart Center from all centers of country between January 2004 and January 2005 for coronary angiography was included. Demographic characteristics of patients were collected by interview and clinical tests and analyzed in two genders. Then, positive predictive value (PPV) of both techniques was calculated and compared.

Results: The total number of positive perfusion scan and stress test were 2178 and 2581, respectively. It was not significant difference between PPV of perfusion scan and stress test in men (86.9% vs 86.6%, P=0.814). PPV of perfusion scan was higher than stress test only in women more than 60 years old (P=0.0002).

Conclusions: According to the results of this study and with regard to high cost of perfusion scan, it seems that in case the possibility of stress test, the use of perfusion scan had no advantages with the condition of our scan centers and especially in women, predictive value of these techniques were similar. However, it is necessary to consider the causes of this unusual finding according to the role of drugs, instruments, and specialists in the future.