Hadadi A, Moradi-Tabriz H, Mehdipour Aghabagher B, Moslehi B, Esmaielzadeh P,
Volume 69, Issue 6 (9-2011)
Abstract
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
AR-SA
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Background: Staphylococcus aureus infection pervasively occurs in communities and
hospitals and observing related guidelines is essential in preventing development
of antibiotic resistance in Hospitals. In this study we tried to determine the
prevalence of Methicillin and vancomycine resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA
& VRSA) and find the most suitable diagnostic tool and
treatment in affected patients.
Methods: This study was performed on hospitalized patients in Sina Hospital in Tehran,
Iran during 2009-2010. Eighty-five staphylococcus
aureus samples were evaluated for resistance to oxacillin and vancomycine
by both disc diffusion and E-test methods.
Results: The study population included 46 male and 39
female patients. The mean age of the participants was 51.46±19.21
years. The MRSA frequency was 50%.
67 (78.8%) patients had hospital-acquired
staphylococcus infection. The rate of hospital-acquired MRSA
was 93%. Length of hospital stay, undergoing invasive
methods, history of antibiotic use three months prior to hospitalization and its
kind were recognized as MRSA risk factors. There
were no reports of VRSA except one case of vancomycine-intermediate
S. aureus (VISA). The results of disk effusion and E-test
methods were consistent.
Conclusion: Considering
the prevalence of methicillin resistance in hospital-acquired infections, it seems
that oxacillin should not be used as the first-line option for empiric therapy
against S. aureus till
antibiogram results are available. Disc diffusion can also be reliably used
instead of the more expensive E-test.