Showing 7 results for Adjuvant
Fazeli Mr, Abbaspour M, Ghahremani Mh, Alimian M, Ilka H, Jamalifar H, Azadi S, Azizi E,
Volume 64, Issue 12 (11-2006)
Abstract
Background: Aluminum salts are common adjuvants in human and animal vaccine preparations. The two adjuvants aluminum phosphate and aluminum hydroxide show acceptable immunoadjuvant properties with many antigens. These two salts have different physicochemical characteristics that make each one suitable for certain antigens. The surface antigen of Hepatitis B (HBsAg) has several antigenic epitopes that bind to aluminum adjuvants by a ligand exchange mechanism. Although HBV vaccines using an aluminum hydroxide adjuvant are available, higher antigenicity is needed for the subgroup of people who do not respond sufficiently to the currently available vaccines.
Methods: A solution of recombinant HBsAg for making different formulations of vaccines with aluminum phosphate (Adju-Phos®) and aluminum hydroxide (Alhydrogel®) adjuvants was obtained from Darupakhsh Pharmaceutical Company. The total protein content, antigenicity, and purity of HBsAg solution were determined using BCA, ELISA, and SDS-PAGE methods, respectively. The different formulations were prepared in the lab and administered i.p. to two test groups of Balb/C mice and a third test group received the Engerix vaccine, which is currently available on the market and uses an aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. The control group of animals received the solution without antigen. After 28 days, heart blood samples were collected and serum was separated to determine the antibody titer against HBsAg using an ELISA kit.
Results: This study shows that the vaccine formulated with aluminum phosphate exerted more immunogenicity than both the aluminum hydroxide laboratory formulation and the Engerix vaccines.
Conclusion: Although the results of our study indicate higher immunogenic properties of the vaccine formulated with the aluminum phosphate adjuvant, complementary experiments are needed to further evaluate the biological properties with respect to effectiveness, adverse effects, product stability and finally possibility for manufacturing and distribution of this new formulation as a Hepatitis B vaccine.
Aghili M, Babaei M, Azmoodeh Ardalan F, Farhan F, Hadad P, Ghanjalikhani M,
Volume 68, Issue 7 (10-2010)
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer is the third common cancer world wide and the forth in Iran. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. In this study we evaluate the efficacy a cox-2 inhibitor on pathologic response, sphincter preservation and acute toxicity during neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Methods: Thirty-six patients that have adenocarcinoma of rectum was enrolled (up to 15 cm of anal verge). The patients were undergone Endometrial Ultrasound (EUS), abdomino-pelvic and chest CT for staging. Then received neoadjuvant concurrent chemo radiation (xeloda 825 mg/m2 bid in combination with celecoxib 100 mg qid and 50-50.4Gy/25-28f). Surgery was done 4-8 weeks after chemoradiation. During the chemoradiation the patients was observed for the probable complication one year. Tumor regression grade was reported.
Results: From 36 surgery patients, Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) was done in 30 patients. Pathologic complete response was seen in eight of 30 patients (26.7%). Tumor regression grade was calculated in three and five grade system: in three grade system 17 patients had grade 1 (60.7%), eight patients had grade 2 (28.6%) and three patients had grade 3 (10.7%). In five grade system of tumor regression eight patients had grade 1 (28.6%), nine patients had grade 2 (32.1%), eight patients grade 3 (28.6%), three patients had grade 4 (10.7%). T down staging was 43.3%. N downstaging was 30.8%. No patient had skin reaction or cardio-vascular complication.
Conclusion: Based on our study results, Celecoxib in combination with neoadjuvant chemoradiation is safe and is associated with low complications. This combination can promote pathologic complete response, TRG and T and N downstaging in Rectal adenocarcinoma.
Mahdi Aghili , Maryam Moshtaghi , Farhad Samiee , Ebrahim Esmati , Mahbod Esfahani , Hasan Ali Nedaee , Peiman Haddad ,
Volume 68, Issue 8 (11-2010)
Abstract
Background: The current standard of adjuvant management for gastric cancer after curative resection based on the results of intergroup 0116 is concurrent chemoradiation. Current guidelines for designing these challenging fields still include two-dimensional simulation with simple AP-PA parallel opposed design. However, the implementation of radiotherapy (RT) remains a concern. Our objective was to compare three-dimensional (3D) techniques to the more commonly used AP-PA technique.
Methods: A total of 24 patients with stages II-IV adenocarcinoma of the stomach were treated with adjuvant postoperative chemoradiation with simple AP-PA technique, using Cobalt-60. Total radiation dose was 50.4Gy. Landmark-based fields were simulated to assess PTV coverage. For each patient, three additional radiotherapy treatment plans were generated using three-dimensional (3D) technique. The four treatment plans were then compared for target volume coverage and dose to normal tissues (liver, spinal cord, kidneys) using dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis.
Results: The three-dimensional planning techniques provided 10% superior PTV coverage compared to conventional AP-PA fields (p<0.001). Comparative DVHs for the right kidney, left kidney and spinal cord demonstrate lower radiation doses using the 3D planning techniques (p<0.0001), the liver dose is higher (p=0.03), but is still well below liver tolerance.
Conclusion: Despite the department protocol using conventional planning, 3D radiotherapy provides 10% superior PTV coverage. It is associated with reduced radiation doses to the kidneys and spinal cord compared to AP-PA techniques with the potential to reduce treatment toxicity.
Samiei F, Maddah Safai A, Esmati E, Alibakhshi A, Mirai Ashtiani Ms, Haddad P,
Volume 70, Issue 7 (10-2012)
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer is an important health problem across the world. Chemotherapy in combination with local treatment is the standard treatment for locally advanced gastroesophageal junction (EGJ) cancers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate response and tolerability to neoadjuvant regimen combining epirobicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabin (EOX) in locoregionally advanced gastric cancer.
Methods: We recruited 28 patients with histologically confirmed advanced gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma in this study performed in the Cancer Institute of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran, Iran in 2010-2011. Staging workup included chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), complete blood cell count (CBC), and liver and renal function tests. After three treatment cycles with EOX regimen, we evaluated response to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy by performing endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and chest and abdominal CT scans.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 56.64±11.08 years (ranging from 37 to 78 years). Most patients were classified as having stage III (98.8%) cancer before chemotherapy while most were classified as stage II (57.14%) after the treatment. Only 28.5% of tumors were resectable before chemotherapy, but 82.1% of them were resectable upon the treatment. 75% of tumors were downstaged after chemotherapy.
Conclusion: Regarding the acceptable response and downstaging of tumors and low toxicity of EOX regimen in locoregionally advanced gastric cancer, evaluation of this regimen as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy in larger phase III clinical trials in Iranian patients would be both necessary and logical.
Sina Soleimani , Shahla Shahsavandi , Omid Maddadgar , Homayoon Mahravani , Mohsen Lotfi ,
Volume 73, Issue 3 (6-2015)
Abstract
Background: In the last decade due to emerge and remerge of influenza viruses, quality improvement of vaccines to increase immune responses in target populations have been more necessary. The potential of biologic adjuvant to stimulate and induce immune system is the basis of modern researches in prevention and controlling program of infectious diseases. In this study, the effect of the coding sequence of cellular Myxovirus resistance (Mx) protein as a biological adjuvant for inducing humoral immune response against influenza virus was investigated.
Methods: The experimental study was performed on Balb/c mice in Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute from June to November 2014. Three conserved motifs of Mx were selected following sequence alignment between human, mouse and bird species. Potential of the motifs for stimulation immune responses against influenza virus were evaluated using in silico analysis. Based on the immune informatics data Mx1 sequence was the best immune inducer and cloned into pcDNA3.1 vector. Then formulated with inactivated H9N2 influenza antigen as adjuvant and injected to mice groups. The sera of vaccinated mice were collected prior to priming and boosting injections and also at defined weeks and analyzed with serological assays. Histopathological examination was done for evaluation of the vaccine and adjuvant safety.
Results: The mean weight of the Balb/c mice in all control and treatment groups was similar and ranged from 21 to 37 gr (P= 0.05). The difference in increasing antibody titers against influenza virus in immunized mice who received Mx1-adjuvanted vaccine especially in second boosting was significant (P= 0.01) compared to the vaccine alone group. More than 78% of the immunized mice receiving two-time boosting have the mean antibody titer of >6 (Log2) which was higher (P= 0.001) comparing to the mice with one booster injection.
Conclusion: These data revealed that Mx1 as biological adjuvant was able to increase antibody titer and induction memory immune responses against influenza immunization without causing any side effects.
Hamidreza Mirzaei , Mohammadreza Barzegartahamtan ,
Volume 77, Issue 12 (3-2020)
Abstract
Background: The rate of recurrence and mortality in high-risk prostate cancer remains high. On the other hand, the use of chemotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer has improved overall survival of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone on increasing survival of patients with high risk localized prostate cancer
Methods: This is a systematic review study. Databases including Scopus, Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, Embase were searched. The terms used include prostate cancer, adenocarcinoma, neoadjuvant, chemotherapy, chemotherapy alone, systemic therapy. Of the various types of articles, only oiginal research studies that specifically focused on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (not chemotherapy with target therapy, immunotherapy, or hormone therapy) were identified. Inclusion criteria included study type (original research studies) and sample type (high-risk localized prostate cancer patients) and outcome type (patient survival).
Results: A total of 17 original research studies were identified. All of these studies were phase one or phase two. Docetaxel was the most commonly used chemotherapy drug. Also, the most common regimen used was the use of docetaxel alone. The rate of decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (>50%) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was reported in 24 to 58% of patients. PSA declines of less than 50% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy occurred in 40 to 100% of patients. No studies reported a complete pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, the relative pathologic response and reduced tumor volume were seen in the majority of patients. All of these studies showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in high-risk prostate cancer patients, was almost well tolerated and that the complications were mostly mild (grade 1 and 2). Grade 3 and 4 complications were negligible. A 2-year recurrence-free survival of up to 68.5% and a 5-year recurrence-free survival of up to 49% were reported. The overall 5-year survival also ranged from 35 to 48%.
Conclusion: The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone has not clearly increased the survival of patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer, and there is controversy in studies.
Ali Torabi, Behrokh Farahmand, Mohammadreza Zolfaghari , Fatemeh Fotouhi, Mohsen Zargar,
Volume 79, Issue 11 (2-2022)
Abstract
Background: Influenza vaccines based on conserved proteins are being developed persistently. The conserved protein vaccines based on Nucleoprotein (NP) are highly protected vaccines against influenza viruses that can be used as a Universal vaccine. Aluminum hydroxide (Alum) is the most common adjuvant used in vaccine formulation to improve immunization by altering the epitopes’ folds. However, due to its toxic effects on the nervous system, especially in infants and young children exposed to multiple vaccine injections during brain development, it is better to use more desirable options such as carbohydrate-based adjuvants. Sucrose ester (SE) is a carbohydrate and non-ionic surfactant that is compatible with the human body and environmentally friendly. This study evaluated the immunogenicity of recombinant NP molecule prepared in a prokaryotic with the accompaniment of sucrose ester adjuvant against lethal influenza virus challenge in a Balb/c mice model.
Methods: The recombinant vector of PET-28a-NP was used to produce NP molecule. The vaccines containing an NP with or without Alum or sucrose ester adjuvants were injected into the mice. The Effectiveness and immunogenicity were examined by evaluating the humeral immunity induction by Immunoglobulin G (IgG), and its subunits production, and cellular immunity induction by Interferon-Gamma (IFN-γ) and Interleukin-4 (IL-4) production by ELISA Method and also animal’s
surveillance was documented. The study took part at the Influenza and other respiratory viruses department of Pasteur institute of Iran in November 2018.
Results: The animals’ surveillance in the Np group was 57.1%, NP+SE was (71.4%), and NP+SE was 64.28%. Also, IgG and its subunits, IL4, and IFN-γ production in both Alum and SE combined vaccines compared to NP alone were significant.
|
Conclusion: In combination with the carbohydrate adjuvant containing sucrose ester compared to the formulation with alum adjuvant, the NP could provide proper and considerable protection and immunity against the homologous strain (H1N1) of the Influenza A virus. It is recommended that SE usage as an adjuvant results in an adequate immune response and less toxic effect.
|
