Tehran University Medical Journal

Background: Cataract is one of the most common eye diseases especially in children and adolescents in two age ranges, and many of these patients need to surgery throughout life. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of midazolam-ketamine and midazolam-fentanyl for sedation in adult cataract surgery.
Methods: In this study, which was a case-control study, 80 patients were referred to Farabi Hospital in Tehran from November to December 2018 for cataract surgery and underwent surgery. The patients were divided into two groups (n=40). In this study the method of using midazolam-ketamine (ketamine group) was compared with the combination of midazolam-fentanyl (fentanyl group). The hemodynamic variables such as blood pressure and heart rate before surgery were measured and then measured every 5 minutes during operation and were recorded. In addition to hemodynamic variables, other variables such as agitation, surgeon satisfaction, recovery nurse satisfaction, degree of oxygen saturation during surgery, and nausea and vomiting were compared between the two groups.
Results: In this study, 18 patients (45%) of fentanyl group and 17 patients (42.5%) of ketamine group were female. Patients in the two groups had similar demographic distribution before surgery. In this study about blood pressure after surgery, from 80 patients, 22 cases had blood pressure below 119.79 mmHg, of which 3 (13.6%) cases were in ketamine group and 19 cases (86.4%) in fentanyl group. In general, 7.5% of ketamine group and 47.5% of fentanyl group had a blood pressure lower than 119.79 mmHg. Hemodynamic changes and hypotension after sedation was more in fentanyl group. Two groups did not differ in terms of heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation during surgery, surgeon satisfaction during surgery, and postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Conclusion: Administration of ketamine-midazolam versus fentanyl-midazolam in patients who underwent cataract surgery by sedation led to more stable hemodynamic variables intraoperatively and other side effects such as heart rate, oxygen saturation, surgeon satisfaction, nausea and vomiting were similar between two groups.

Background: Cataract is one of the most common eye diseases especially in elderly patients and most of these patients require surgery. In the process of sedation, different drugs are used, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Dexmedetomidine is one of the drugs that has recently received special attention for sedation. In this study, we compared the drug combination of dexmedetomidine-fentanyl with midazolam-fentanyl in cataract surgery.
Methods: In a case-control study, the patients who underwent cataract surgery by a surgeon with topical anesthesia and sedation techniques were included in the target group. Seventy patients were divided into two groups of 35 according to a random number table. One group received dexmedetomidine-fentanyl (dexmedetomidine group) and the other received midazolam-fentanyl (midazolam group). Age, sex, weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, patient sedation, surgeon satisfaction, recovery nurse satisfaction, and postoperative nausea and vomiting were compared between the two groups. The study was performed in the Farabi Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from October to November 2019.
Results: Patients in the two groups were similar in age, sex, weight, and preoperative hemodynamic variables. There was no significant difference in preoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure between the two groups (P=0.150). However, those who received dexmedetomidine had significantly lower intraoperative heart rate (P<0.001). The difference in postoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as postoperative heart rate was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in postoperative sedation (P=0.93). The surgeon’s satisfaction was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.17). Also, the rate of recovery nurse satisfaction was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.21). The incidence of nausea and vomiting was similar in both groups (P=1.00).
Conclusion: Sedation with dexmedetomidine decreases blood pressure and heart rate. Therefore, it is recommended to use dexmedetomidine more cautiously in patients with unstable hemodynamics and especially in short surgical procedures.

Background: Cataract surgery is one of the most common surgeries in the world, especially in elderly patients, and often performed topically with sedative agents. Ketamine is one of the most commonly used agents and the effect of different doses on intraocular pressure is in dispute. The present study investigates the effect of a low dose of ketamine on intraocular pressure in patients undergoing cataract surgery.
Methods: This case-control study was performed in Farabi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences from January 2020 to February 2020. In this study 92 patients undergoing cataract surgery were randomly divided into two groups of 46 patients. Patients' intraocular pressure and blood pressure were measured at baseline, and then all patients received 1 mg midazolam and 1 μg/kg fentanyl before initiation of the study. In the case group, 0.15 mg/kg ketamine was injected intravenously. Intraocular pressure and blood pressure of all subjects were measured three minutes after injection of sedation. Also, postoperative pain, need for opioids and, postoperative nausea and vomiting were compared between the two groups.

Background: The risk of anesthesia increases with age, so it is necessary to choose a safe and effective method. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of intranasal fentanyl with intravenous fentanyl in patients undergoing cataract surgery.
Methods: This study was a triple-blind prospective randomized clinical trial (The patient, physician, and data analyzer were unaware of the patient grouping). The study was performed from April 2017 to March 2019 in Feyz Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. 90 patients over 18 years of age who were candidates for cataract surgery were included in the study and were divided in two groups receiving intravenous fentanyl (IVF) or intranasal fentanyl (INF). The dose of fentanyl in both groups was 1.5 μg/kg with a maximum of 100 μg. In the IVF group, 1 ml of normal saline was dripped into each nasal passage 10 minutes before surgery and intravenously fentanyl was injected 2 minutes before surgery. In the INF group, 1 ml of fentanyl was administered into each nostril 10 minutes before surgery and 2 ml of saline was administered intravenously two minutes before surgery.

Background: Cataracts are the leading diseases that cause blindness. Cataracts can be treated with surgery. Pain, itching, burning, and a foreign body sensation in the eye are common ocular complaints of patients in recovery. In this study, we compared the effect of Ketorolac eye drops and naphazoline antazoline eye drops on reducing complaints of surgery.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial study was performed from February 2016 to March 2017 on patients who were candidates for cataract surgery at Feyz University Hospital in Isfahan, Iran.  In this study, 54 patients were enrolled in two groups receiving Ketorolac eye drops and naphazoline antazoline (NA) eye drops. After the operation, patients' ocular complaints such as burning, itching, pain, and severity were evaluated every 15 minutes in recovery and every half hour in the ward until discharge from the hospital.
Results: In this study, 54 patients in two groups of 27 were studied. In the post-anesthesia care unit, the burning sensation in the naphazoline-antazoline group was significantly lower than in the ketorolac group (P=0.02). Patients in the NA group had less foreign body sensation in the eye in recovery (P=0.97) and the ward (P<0.001) than in the ketorolac group. Mean Pain intensity in the recovery unit (P=0.39) and ward unit in the ketorolac group were less than NA (P<0.001). In the recovery unit in the NA group, the eye-burning sensation was significantly lower than in the ketorolac group. The foreign body sensation in the NA group was less than the ketorolac group but there was no significant difference between the two groups. In the NA group, itching of the eyes was less than in the ketorolac group.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that ketorolac drops have been more effective in reducing post-operative eye pain than NA and NA drops have been more effective in reducing burning, itching and foreign body sensation in the eyes than Ketorolac.

Background: To improve the quality of sedation in procedures, different medications are used alone or in combination with each other, but so far, no administration method that is agreed upon by anesthesiologists has been presented. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of intranasal ketamine in comparison with intravenous ketamine in cataract surgery.
Methods: This clinical trial was performed from December 2016 to March 2017 in Feyz Hospital, Isfahan. Ninety patients over the age of 18 who were candidates for cataracts surgery were randomly assigned to receive 1 mg/kg ketamine through the nasal route (INk) or intravenously (IVK). Ten minutes before the surgery, ketamine was administered in the INK group and intranasal saline in the IVK group. Two minutes before the start of surgery, normal saline was administered in the INK group and ketamine was administered intravenously in the IVK group. Patients received intravenous midazolam 0.04 mg/kg during prep and drape. The quality of sedation and analgesia, vital signs, patient and doctor satisfaction, and side effects were recorded during the study period. Data were analyzed using of SPSS software, version 23 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results: In this study, 90 people were included in the study, 53 of whom (58.9%) were men. The mean age of the patients was 61.5±10.6. Two groups had a significant difference in terms of gender (P=0.696), age (P=0.960), weight (P=0.212), height (P=0.632), underlying disease (P=0.094), and type of disease (P=0.090). Two groups were not significantly different in terms of mean heart rate (P=0.77), mean arterial blood pressure (P=0.13), mean blood oxygen saturation (P=0.58), patient satisfaction (P=0.470) and surgeon satisfaction (P=0.115), pain intensity (P=0.506), level of sedation level (P=0.477) and side effects (P=0.221). Conclusion: Intranasal administration of ketamine provides similar sedation and cardiovascular response compared to intravenous administration of ketamine. Administering ketamine intranasally is a non-invasive, safe and effective method with easy application and can be a suitable alternative to intravenous administration.

Background: Cataract surgery is the most common surgery in the world. The prevalence of age-related cataract increases with age, and its prevalence increases with each decade of age after forty years. Various drugs are used to control analgesia and hemodynamics in patients undergoing cataract surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare dexmedetomidine and 2% lidocaine in the control of analgesia and hemodynamic changes in cataract surgery with local anesthesia.
Methods: In this double-blind clinical trial study, 52 patients with anesthesia class I and II underwent cataract surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: lidocaine (three cc) and dexmedomedin (five μg/kg + lidocaine). The information collection checklist in this study included: age, gender, history of aspirin use, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, intraocular pressure, postoperative complications, and postoperative pain.

Results:  The Mann-Whitney U test showed that the Dex-Metomedin group had less pain than the Lidocaine group in the first hour after the intervention (P=0.012). Two hours after the intervention, the dexmedemodin group had less pain than the lidocaine group (P=0.001). In the investigation of IOP after retrobulbar block in the dexmedetomidine group, we saw a significant increase in IOP from 16.56±3.12 to 17.96±2.68 mmHg compared to before the block (P=0.001). In the lidocaine group, we also saw a significant increase in IOP from 16.18±3.66 to 19.66±4.67 mm Hg compared to before the block (P=0.001). Before and after retrobulbar block, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.694 and P=0.108, respectively). To investigate the effect of these interventions more precisely, the amount of IOP pressure change was also compared between the two groups, and we saw a greater increase in the lidocaine group than in the dexmedetomidine group (P=0.002). Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that dexmedetomidine + lidocaine in retrobulbar form compared to lidocaine was able to control the pain level of patients after surgery and systolic and diastolic blood pressure during surgery. It is suggested to use this drug as local anesthesia in cataract surgery.

Background: Preoperative anxiety assessment allows for better analgesia in the postoperative period and a better experience for the patient. Previous studies have investigated anxiety factors specific to cataract surgery, reporting vision problems, particularly blindness, among the main preoperative fears. However, there is little research that fully and accurately investigates the causes and factors of anxiety in this population. Therefore, in this study, the factors related to anxiety in the elective eye patients.
Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, the comparison of the level of anxiety in elective eye patients of Shahid Mohammadi Bandar Abbas Hospital in the spring and summer of 2023 was investigated. Patients referred to Bandar Abbas Shahid Mohammadi Hospital were included in the study according to the entry criteria and obtaining informed consent. In this study, after the approval of the research committee of the university, the necessary information was made by the researcher's checklist, which includes gender, age, causes of anxiety, patient's level of education, previous history of eye surgery, previous history of non-eye surgery and other underlying diseases. Was collected and the level of anxiety was measured in 2 stages before and after eye surgery based on VAS criteria.
Results: In this study, 85 (47.2%) patients were male and 95 (52.8%) were female. Also, most of the patients had a diploma-level education. Most patients mentioned a non-ocular surgery history (18.3%). Also, most of the patients (52.8%) noted an unknown cause as an anxiety-causing factor, and the least frequent among the anxiety-causing causes mentioned by the patients was the fear of death due to surgery. The level of anxiety in patients who had a history of non-ocular surgery was significantly lower. Patients who mentioned the unknown cause, the surgery itself, and financial problems as the cause of their anxiety experienced significantly higher preoperative anxiety and postoperative anxiety.
Conclusion: The level of anxiety in patients who have a history of eye and non-eye surgery is significantly lower. Preoperative anxiety and postoperative anxiety are significantly higher in patients who mention the unknown cause, the surgery itself, and financial problems as the cause of their anxiety.