Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Hand Surgery

Kamrani Rs, Haj Zargarbashi R, Mehrpour Sr, Sharafat Vaziri A, Tabatabaeiyan M,
Volume 67, Issue 7 (10-2009)
Abstract

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE AR-SA MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Background: Flexor tendon injury is one of the unanswered problems in reconstructive surgery of the hand. Although pull out method is one of the best reconstructive approaches but still is controversial. Surgeons prefer immobilization to prevent laceration at the site of the suture but it may cause adhesion and lead to surgical failure. The aim of this study was to perform a new surgical method to achieve a tendon repair without these problems.
Methods: In this case-series study, 80 fingers with flexor tendon impairment selected and divided into four groups (tendon laceration & avulsion, tendon graft reconstructed in 1 & 2 stages) then patients were surgically treated by the new technique. The most important aspect of the technique is the placement of the suture in the direction of strength therefore, following any tension the suture would be tighter and this point help us to mobilize the injured tendon immediately after the surgery then we analyzed the results depends on the patient's group.
Results: The pull out and surgical (functional) results were evaluated. 97% of the pull out results were good and 3% were poor and surgical results were 23.9% excellent, 52.2% good, 17.9% fair and 6% poor.
Conclusion: Depend on the acceptable results, immobilization in these patients is unnecessary & active and passive range of motion would be gradually increased as soon as possible. However biomechanical studies would be beneficial to evaluate this suture influence and designing future studies to compare this technique with old methods would be essential.


Behrang Rezvani Kakhki , Morteza Talebi Deloei , Maryam Sobhani, Maryam Ziyaei,
Volume 82, Issue 10 (1-2025)
Abstract

Background: Controlling pain and anxiety in children is important and at the same time more difficult compared to adults. In the present study, an attempt has been made to reduce the overall dose and, as a result, the complications caused by ketamine by adding local anesthesia with lidocaine after analgesia and intravenous sedation with ketamine.
Methods: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was carried out at the emergency ward of Khatam Al-Anbia Hospital, Zahedan, between June 2018 and March 2019. A total of 60 children with finger injuries with the age range of 1 to 5 years were divided into two groups of 30 people by random block method. The control group was injected with only intravenous ketamine at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg, and the intervention group was injected with local anesthesia with lidocaine after the injection of intravenous ketamine. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 21) with descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation) and inferential statistical tests (Student’s t-test, chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney U test) at a significance level of P<0.05.
Results: The recovery time in the intervention group (29.27±9.48 minutes) was significantly less than the control group (35.90±10.59 minutes) (P=0.01). No significant cardiopulmonary complications occurred in the two groups. The incidence of vomiting (P=0.08) and the drop in blood oxygen saturation percentage (P=0.3) were higher in the control group than in the intervention group, but it was not statistically significant. Adding local anesthesia to intravenous injection of ketamine significantly delays the duration of the second repetition of ketamine injection (P=0.01), But it did not affect the time of the first and third repetition of ketamine dose.
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that the intervention group required significantly fewer ketamine doses than the control group. Notably, adjunctive lidocaine local anesthesia was associated with shorter recovery times and prolonged intervals before second-dose ketamine administration, while no such effects were observed for the first or third doses. These results imply that lidocaine supplementation could optimize intravenous ketamine therapy by accelerating recovery and reducing subsequent dose requirements, though additional research is needed to validate these observations.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb