Showing 10 results for Medication
Khalili Gr, Sajedi P, Danesh H,
Volume 69, Issue 11 (2-2012)
Abstract
Background: Emergence agitation (EA) is a post-anesthetic problem which interferes with a child's recovery and presents a challenge in terms of assessment and management. In this study, we compared the effects of midazolam and ketamine as premedication in the management of EA in children aged 1-6 years.
Methods: In this prospective, randomized clinical trial study, 58 children aged 1-6 years who were undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery in Alzahra Hospital in Isfahan during 2008 until 2009. The patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.1 mg/kg midozolam (28) or 0.5 mg/kg ketamine (29) by IV route in the premedication room. All patients received a standardized anesthetic regimen and isoflurane was used for the maintenance of anesthesia. The incidence and severity of agitation (agitation score), severity of pain (pain score), anesthesia, recovery and extubation durations were recorded postoperatively.
Results: The prevalence of agitation in midazolam (21.4%) was lower than ketamine group (34.5% P<0.05). In addition, the duration of agitation in ketamine group (21±16.67 min) was significantly higher than midazolam group (6.83±6.55 min), (P<0.05). However, no significant differences were seen in agitation score, pain score, anesthesia, recovery or extubation durations in the two groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion: The study showed that midazolam could reduce the frequency of agitation better than ketamine but both drugs were able to reduce the severity of agitation after short-time surgeries in young children.
Zahedi H, Maleki A,
Volume 70, Issue 4 (7-2012)
Abstract
Background: Drugs applied topically to the eye may be absorbed systemically to a substantial degree, with the potential to cause serious systemic side-effects. Children may be particularly vulnerable to systemic effects of topically applied agents as topical doses are often not weight-adjusted.
Case presentation: This article describes a case of serious systemic side-effect by the use of topical phenylephrine, tetracaine, tropicamide and atropine in a 17-year old boy candidate for deep viterectomy in Farabi Hospital in 1389. Following application of the aforesaid eye drops, the patient developed hypertension and subsequent loss of conciseness.
Conclusion: Several types of eye drops and their repeated use can lead to their systemic absorption and medical complications due to overdose. Strategies to minimize systemic absorption should be applied, including use of low concentrations of ophthalmic drugs, administration of one type of the drug, use of microdrops and punctal occlusion to minimize absorption via the nasolacrimal duct. While administering ophthalmic drops, one should take these precautions to minimize the systemic effects of the drugs to prevent subsequent complications.
Alizade Khatir A, Panahkhahi M, Khage Nasiri A, Ramim T, Toghae M,
Volume 70, Issue 5 (8-2012)
Abstract
Background: Medication overuse headaches (MOH) include headaches that last more than 15 days a month and usually occur after long-term use of analgesic. Most methods of medical treatment are ineffective. In some studies, great occipital nerve block is used to treat the headaches.
Methods: This double-blind experimental study was performed in adult patients with MOH who attended Sina Hospital in Tehran from June 2009 to June 2011. Greater occipital nerve (GON) block was done in the two groups of patients by administering a combination of 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2 ml of 5% saline or 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 80 mg of methyl prednisolone. We evaluated headache severity by Visual analog scale (VAS) and recorded days without headache. If patients were taking pain medications, preventive medications were given as usual before and after the injection. Student's t-test was performed for statistical analysis and a P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Overall, 13 male and 19 female patients with a mean age of 39.88±8.76 years participated in the study. The mean reduction in headache severity one hour after injection was 5.56±1.03 and 4.63±1.92 in the first and second groups, respectively. Average days without headache one month after injection were 8.75 and 4.75 days in the first and second groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups.
Conclusion: Both methods seem to be effective in medication overuse headaches treatment. This finding is important as non-responders to conventional methods will otherwise have a decreased quality of life.
Reza Karbasi-Afshar , Reza Noroozian , Ayat Shahmari , Amin Saburi ,
Volume 71, Issue 3 (6-2013)
Abstract
Background: Sympathetic complex of over-activation kidneys is one of the main causes of primary hypertension (HTN). We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sympathectomy using 5Fr mariner catheter ablation on patients with refractory hypertension.
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, patients who received three or more anti-hypertensive medications with 160mmHg systolic blood pressure (BP) or more were randomly included and divided into 2 groups. Cases in the first group were undergone to renal denervation and the second group was treated by previous antihypertensive medications. Both groups were followed for six month by assessing BP and adverse effects.
Results: One hundred and seventeenth patients (54%) out of 212 screened patients were included in the first group (renal denervation) and 95 patients as the second group. The mean of BP changes in the first group was 35/15 mmHg with standard deviation of 22/11mmHg. (P<0.001) in the second group, the mean changes of BP was not statistically significant. (5/0mmHg± 22/11, P=0.79 for systolic BP and P=0.96 for diastolic BP). 92% of 117 patients in the first group had a favorable BP decrease, which was defined as a 20mmHg or more decrease in BP, in comparison with 15% of 95 patients as controls (P=0.001). There was no observed complication after denervation in the first group.
Conclusion: It seems that the sympathetic renal denervation can be an effective and safe method for treatment of refractory hypertensive patients indeed of routine medications although further studies with longer follow up duration and more cases are suggested for confirming this issue.
Mansoureh Toghae , Mohammad Reza Ghini , Seyed Mohammad Hassan Pak-Nejad, Elahe Taghvaii Zahmat Kesh , Tayeb Ramim ,
Volume 71, Issue 12 (3-2014)
Abstract
Background: Many drugs have been abused by patients for headache management. Celecoxib has not been abuse widely as a pain relief drug for headache. The aim of this study was comparison between celecoxib and prednisolone in bridge stage therapy following medication overuse headache.
Methods: A double-blind randomized clinical trial was done in patients admitted to a private headache clinic in Tehran, Iran at 2012. Patients were selected with 18- 65 years old and 15 days headache per month at least. Prednisone was administered as a 75 mg/day, 50 mg/day, 30 mg/day, 25 mg/day and 10 mg/day dose, in 3 days interval. Celecoxib was administered as a 100mg dose three times per day (first 5 days), twice per day (second 5 days) and one time per day (third 5 days). Headache time, headache intensity, headache duration, analgesic consumption due to severe headache and drug side effects was assessed. We used the visual analog scale to determine the severity of the pain.
Results: One hundred and three patients were enrolled in two groups: celecoxib (53 cases) and prednisolone (50 cases). Twenty and one men and eighty and one women with a mean age of 33.62±9.65 years participated in the study. The maximum fre-quency for headache time in the celecoxib group was 1-4 hours (19 cases) and more than four hours (19 cases). In the prednisolone group the maximum frequency for headache time was more than 4 hours (28 cases) (P=0.149). The frequency of side effects of prednisolone and celecoxib groups were 42% and 18.9%, respectively (Relative Risk=2.2, P=0.011). The most common side effects in both groups were weakness and lethargy.
Conclusion: Considering the positive effect of both drugs in reducing patients' head-ache during withdrawal, celecoxib compared with prednisolone has better efficacy and fewer side effects.
Alireza Mahoori , Ebrahim Hassani , Nazli Karami , Mehrdad Azizpoure ,
Volume 75, Issue 5 (8-2017)
Abstract
Background: Tracheal intubation and direct laryngoscopy are powerful noxious stimuli that can elicit sever hemodynamic responses. These hemodynamic responses should be attenuated by appropriate use of premedication, smooth induction of anesthesia and rapid tracheal intubation. Gabapentin and pregabalin have been suggested in several studies to be efficient. Gabapentin is an antiepileptic drug and a structural analogue of gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) but it does not act through GABA receptors and pregabalin, is also an antiepileptic agent. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of gabapentin and pregabalin as premedication for attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.
Methods: In a prospective double blinded randomized clinical trial, during April 2015 to March 2016 in Urmia Imam Khomeini Hospital, a total of ninety normotensive adult consented patients, candidate to elective abdominal surgery aged 20-50 years, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class I, of both gender were randomized into three groups. Patients in group I received oral placebo, group II received oral gabapentin 900 mg and group III patients received oral pregabalin 150 mg two hours prior to induction of anesthesia. Anesthetic technique was same in three groups and all groups were assessed for hemodynamic changes such as heart rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, after the premedication, before and after induction of anesthesia, and 1, 3 and 5 minutes. after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.
Results: Significant increase in heart rate and systolic blood pressure and diastolic arterial pressure was observed in placebo group after tracheal intubation, while statistically significant attenuation of hemodynamic changes was seen in gabapentin and pregabalin groups. (P=0.001) No adverse outcome was reported in the study groups.
Conclusion: Oral gabapentin premedication is effective for control of hemodynamic pressor response of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. The study data showed that the pregabalin have the same effect. Pregabalin and gabapentin are both useful and safe for control of hemodynamic pressor response as premedication.
Shirinsadat Badri , Sara Etemadi-Moghaddam , Azadeh Moghaddas ,
Volume 77, Issue 12 (3-2020)
Abstract
Background: Amphotericin B is one of the most useful therapeutic modalities for the treatment of patients with invasive fungal infections, in spite of serious side effects, namely kidney injury, electrolyte imbalances, and infusion-related reactions. The goal of this study was to assess the different aspects of premedication practice and the incidence and types of infusion-related reactions in patients receiving amphotericin B.
Methods: This observational study was performed on 70 hospitalized patients who received amphotericin B in different departments of two university hospitals, affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran, from January 2017 to February 2018. Information on physicians’ performance regarding premedication administration for amphotericin B, including the types and doses of medications administered prior to amphotericin B infusion, as well as patients’ clinical data including infusion-related side effects were collected and then analyzed in comparison with the standard practice guidelines.
Results: The study population consisted of 70 patients with the mean age of 51.6±18.3 years, who received amphotericin B for 8.2±3.5 days. From 70 evaluated patients, 21 patients (30%) had encountered the infusion-related reactions, including chills, fever, urticaria, headache, and hypotension. These side effects were evident in 19 patients (27%) who received no premedication and 2 patients (3%) who received only one drug as premedication, before amphotericin B administration. Twenty patients (28%) experienced chills, fever and headache, while 7 patients (10%) had nausea and vomiting during amphotericin B infusion. Hydrocortisone 50-200 mg, was the most prescribed agent for premedication (in 67% of patients), while chlorpheniramine 10 mg (in 50% of patients) and promethazine 10 mg (in 35% of patients) were the second and third prescribed ones, respectively.
Conclusion: In this study, the patients who received no or only one drug as premedication experienced infusion-related side effects. This emphasizes the necessity for standard premedication practices to prevent this type of adverse reactions. Considering the higher price of liposomal form of Amphotericin-B, if prescribed correctly, even the conventional form would be an effective and tolerable treatment for invasive fungal infections.
Mohammad Taghi Najafi , Mohammad Hossein Shojamoradi , Farzanehsadat Minoo ,
Volume 78, Issue 2 (5-2020)
Abstract
Background: Resistant hypertension is defined when the blood pressure remains elevated above the therapeutic target levels despite the use of three antihypertensive agents including calcium channel blocker (CCB), renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blocker and a diuretic. These drugs should be used at maximally tolerated doses and white coat effect and non-adherence should also be excluded. In this article, by describing a case of resistant hypertension, we discuss a diagnostic and therapeutic approach to resistant hypertension.
Case Presentation: A 59 years old man, known case of diabetic nephropathy with a serum creatinine level of 1.2 mg/dL and proteinuria of about 3300 mg in 24 hours referred to Hypertension Clinic of Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, for evaluation of resistant hypertension. The patient was under treatment by losar-H, diltiazem, and furosemide, which are not appropriate combinations of antihypertensive agents. The ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) of the patient revealed daytime and nighttime hypertension and also the non-dipping status of blood pressure. Dihydropyridine CCB was prescribed in combination with RAS blocker (Exforge 50 mg/ 160 mg) and the diuretic was changed to thiazide-like agents. In the next step, spironolactone and carvedilol were added for better control of blood pressure. The patient referred to the sleep clinic for polysomnography and evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea. Following three months prescription of these medications, ABPM revealed relatively appropriate control of blood pressure, so the average 24-hour blood pressure decreased from 157/91 mm Hg to 136/83 mm Hg.
Conclusion: The complications and mortality of hypertension would be increased dramatically in patients with resistant hypertension. So, an appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic approaches should be considered for these patients. Choosing appropriate diuretic agents would be important in the management of resistant hypertension.
Hossein Shakeri , Aliasghar Arabi Mianroodi , Mohammadali Haghbin , Narges Khanjani ,
Volume 78, Issue 3 (6-2020)
Abstract
Background: A major problem in surgical procedures is postoperative pain. The effectiveness of prescribing preoperative tizanidine in reducing postoperative pain is not clear. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of tizanidine as a premedication in reducing pain after septoplasty.
Methods: This double blind clinical trial study was performed in 71 patients aged from 18 to 50 years, undergoing septoplastic surgery for the first time, who were classified in ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classes 1 and 2 in the Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) Department of Shafa Hospital, in Kerman, Iran from April 2014 to March 2015. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups using numbers from a randomization table. A dosage of 4 mg of tizanidine was administered orally to the patients two hours before the surgery (septoplasty) in the intervention group. In the control group, placebo pills which were 100 mg vitamin B1 were prescribed. The severity of pain was measured and recorded after 4 and 8 hours, and the morning after the surgery.
Results: 62 patients (87.32%) were male and 9 (12.68%) were female. The mean age of the subjects was 24.6±7.5 years. The two groups were similar in regard to age (P=0.54), but the duration of surgery was different in the two groups (P=0.038) and was longer in the group that received tizanidine. The mean of pain was different between the two groups, after 4 hours and was significantly higher in the group that received tizanidine (P=0.043). The mean of pain was not significantly different between the two groups after 8 hours (P=0.95) or one day after surgery (P=0.79).
Conclusion: Although some researchers have reported that taking tizanidine before some surgeries may reduce postoperative pain, in this study the administration of tizanidine before surgery was not effective in reducing pain after septoplasty.
Samaneh Assarzadeh, Shirin Sadat Badri, Sakinah Haddad , Marjan Mansourian, Shadi Farsaei, Saeed Abbasi,
Volume 78, Issue 8 (11-2020)
Abstract
Background: Intravenous (IV) injection of drugs is one of the most common methods of drug prescription in hospitals, which is a complex, potentially hazardous and erroneous method; accordingly, it requires control methods to reduce the potential risks. This study focused on determining the frequency and types of different medication errors while preparing and administering mostly used IV drugs in three intensive care units (ICU) and one general department in AL-Zahra hospital, Isfahan, Iran.
Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted for 6 months from September 2017 to March 2018. To determine the frequency of different medication errors, a quoting sampling method was applied to select and observe 400 cases of IV drug administrations. All nurses from any studied department were included in this study. Different stages of preparation and administration of the observed drugs were compared to an instructed checklist prepared by the clinical pharmacist.
|
Results: Totally, 75 nurses were recruited from ICU-1 (N=29), ICU-2 (N=18), ICU-3 (N=19), and nephrology (N=9) departments. Type of department and occupation were the influential factors on nursing errors; also, a significant relationship was found between different work shifts and the occurrence of nurses’ errors, mostly seen in the evening work shift (P=0.037). The mean of nurses’ errors in IV drug administration was not correlated with other factors including age, work history, and the number of patients managed by each one. Also, a positive correlation was found between the number of nurses in each work shift and the number of errors (P=0.008).
Conclusion: Medication errors in each stage of drug administration may lead to the hazardous clinical outcome or serious side effects such as thrombosis, infection or eventually lead to morbidity or mortality. Therefore, being aware of these errors and establishing observational policies can prevent unpleasant events related to drug administration.
|
