Gholamreza Pourmand , Mohsen Ayati , Ali Razi , Aliakbar Karami , Rashid Ramazani , Ayat Ahmadi , Parvin Akbari Asbagh, Rahil Mashhadi , Shadi Pourmand ,
Volume 73, Issue 5 (8-2015)
Abstract
Background: Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA), also known as gamma-seminoprotein or kallikrein-3 (KLK3), is the best marker for early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Since age and race are affecting PSA levels, determining age-specific reference ranges of PSA in every community is necessary for increasing the efficiency rate of PSA. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the normal distribution of total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA) and free prostate-specific antigen (FPSA) and determine age-specific reference ranges of PSA in Iranian men.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 1200 normal men with the age range of 50 to 79 referred to Shahid Rajaie Hospital, Qazvin Province in Iran, from 2011 to 2013. After excluding patients with prostate cancer and urinary tract infection, 1020 men were included in this study. Then, their blood samples were collected and after the extraction of serum from blood, serum levels of FPSA and TPSA were measured using commercial kits the reference range of PSA was specified for each age group and compared with reference ranges of other populations.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 61.03±7.5 years and the mean values of FPSA and TPSA were 0.47±0.6 ng/ml and 1.56±2.05 ng/ml, respectively. PSA serum levels (95th percentile range) in 50 to 59, 60 to 69 and 70 to 79-year age groups were 0-3.6 ng/ml, 0-5.7 ng/ml and 0-6.8 ng/ml, respectively. TPSA (r= 0.2, P< 0.001) and FPSA (r= 0.22, P< 0.001) were significantly associated with age. In addition, a significant relationship was found between TPSA serum levels and alcohol consumption (P= 0.017), smoking (P< 0.001) and family history of prostate cancer (P= 0.014).
Conclusion: Findings of the present study showed that PSA levels are correlated with age. It was also revealed that the PSA age-specific reference range obtained in this study is different from other races and is specific to Iranian men. Therefore, age-specific reference ranges of PSA obtained in the present study can increase PSA test sensitivity and specificity by reducing unnecessary diagnostic procedures and early detection of prostate cancer in Iranian men.
Roghaye Ghasemi, Azadeh Shojaei, Behnaz Karimi,
Volume 77, Issue 2 (5-2019)
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer is currently the third malignant disease in Iran and fifth common cancer worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the expression of GPRC6A, E.cadherin, and ZEB1 genes in prostate cancer in comparison with benign tumor. Since early detection of cancer plays an important role in treatment, this study aims to identify the role of GPRC6A, E.cadherin and ZEB1 genes in screening of prostate cancer.
Methods: In this case-control study, 30 samples including 15 samples of malignant prostate cancer and 15 samples of benign tumor were collected from the patients. RNA was extracted from the tissues, followed by cDNA preparation. In the last step, expression of GPRC6A, E.cadherin and ZEB1 genes was measured using the Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique and the Relative expression software tool (REST), Version 2009 (http://rest.gene-quantification.info/).
Results: In this study, the expression of GPRC6A genes compared to its benign tumor increased 3-fold, ZEB1 expression in prostate cancer, compared to its benign tumor, increased 2-fold, and expression of E.cadherin gene in cancerous samples compared to benign tumor declines 10 was equal. In this study, there was no significant relationship between the expression of genes in benign and malignant samples with common diagnostic factors in this type of disease such as age, Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), pathologic stage and Gleason score.
Conclusion: According to this study and similar studies, increased expression of GPRC6A in prostate cancer cells can stimulate the progression of cancer cells by regulating cell proliferation and invasive response to various ligands. Increasing the expression of ZEB1 and decreasing the expression of E.cadherin is also due to the lack of binding of cells and spread of metastasis. As a result, tumors express ZEB1 with absence of E.cadherin is associated with advanced disease or metastases, which indicates that ZEB1 induces EMT and tumor progression in clinical cancers. Therefore examined genes have potential for screening prostate cancer and they can be used as a diagnostic marker for prostate cancer with further investigation.
Solmaz Ohadian Moghadam , Erfan Amini , Mohsen Ayati , Hassan Jamshidian , Seyed Ali Moemeni , Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam , Mohammad Reza Nowroozi ,
Volume 77, Issue 10 (1-2020)
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer has been reported as a worldwide important kind of cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality among men. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum level is one of the most important markers of prostate cancer diagnosis. While PSA level helps predict the risk of prostate cancer development, researchers still looking for ways to increase the accuracy of prognostic models. To increase the specificity of PSA and decrease of unnecessary biopsies and morbidity, PSA-related parameters such as PSA doubling time (PSADT) have been used. In this study, the relationship between this factor and the severity of prostate cancer was evaluated.
Methods: In this retrospective study, the data of patients who were subjected to transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsy of the prostate and referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, between 2009 and 2017 were reviewed. We enrolled the men with at least two consecutive elevated PSA level within three months to calculate PSADT. Based on the pathology report, primary and secondary Gleason score (GS) were determined. Correspondingly, considering GS, the patients were divided into two groups with high-grade and low-grade tumor (GS<7 considered as low-grade and GS>7 considered as high-grade tumor).
Results: Totally, 1712 cases of TRUS biopsy of the prostate were studied. Among them, 547 (32.3%) had prostate cancer, of whom 73 cases were eligible based on inclusion criteria and were consented to enroll in the study. According to the data obtained, we found a significant difference in PSADT between the two groups of patients with high-grade and low-grade malignancy (mean±SD PSADT, 9.8±14.2 vs. 16.1±14.9 respectively, P=0.004). Considering the seven months as the cut-off point for PSADT in determining malignancy, there was a significant difference between the two groups according to Fisher's exact test (P=0.01).
Conclusion: In our study, PSADT cut-off of 7 months provided the greatest accuracy for differentiation between low-grade and high-grade malignancy, and PSADT has acceptable accuracy for the diagnosis of high-grade tumors.
