Tehran University Medical Journal

---

Background: Immediately after Comprehensive Medical Basic Sciences Examination (CMBSE), the secretariat of the Medical Basic Sciences Education Council (MBSEC) proceeds to rank medical universities according to the students’ scores both in individual academic subjects such as biochemistry, English and in all subjects put together. This study believes that the method used in ranking the universities according to the students’ English scores is not a proper method and thus doesn’t provide accurate results.
Methods: Seven of the major and smaller universities were selected. The language scores of all the students admitted to the medical schools of these universities during 3 academic years of 1378 to 1381 (2426 students in all) in both CMBSE and National university Entrance Examination (NUEE) were obtained. The language scores of each students in NUEE and CMBSE were matched.
Results: A significant correlation (max. R=69%, P<0.004 to min. R=27%, P<0.045) was observed between these two grades in all universities studied. Moreover despite the secretariat’s decision to calculate the scores and rank the universities in two separate groups of major and small universities, in some CMBSEs certain smaller universities were ranked in the group of major ones and in some others vice versa.
Conclusions: This has impaired the university ranking in the subject of English language. This study proposes two different ranking methods, that eliminate the present drawback in university ranking according to their student’s English scores.

---

Background: Currently, share of the scientific output, citation per paper, and co-authorship for articles indexed in databases such as ISI Web of Science, are very important criteria for the evaluation and ranking of countries, researchers, institutes, articles, disciplines and journals in the world. Therefore, the main objectives of the study were to determine co-authorship, the average citation per paper and the most prolific Iranian university or institution in the field of immunology.

Methods: For performing this scientometric study, we employed survey methods and citation analysis of the indexed papers in the ISI Web of Science from 1974 to 2010.

Results: A total of 1775 articles by Iranian authors in the field of immunology had been indexed in the database for the aforesaid period. Most collaborations and co-authorship of Iranian authors was with their counterparts from the USA. The average citation per paper in the field was 6.26 per paper. Tehran University of Medical Sciences had the highest number of articles in the database.

Conclusion: According to the results, Iranians collaborated with American peers more than any other nationality andthe average citation per paper in the field of immunology is higher than that of other fields in Iran but lower than the global average. Tehran University of Medical Sciences is the most prolific university in the field.