Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Rectum

Arezoo Mehrabian, Hamed Ghaffari, Soheila Refahi , Mohammad Haghparast , Abolhasan Rezaeyan,
Volume 80, Issue 12 (3-2023)
Abstract

                                                                
Adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy can control biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy and reduce the risk of distant metastases. Dose-escalated radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy can lead to improved biochemical relapse-free survival. Over the last decades, despite the technological advancements in prostate radiotherapy, radiation-induced rectal toxicity is still the main limiting factor for dose escalation owing to the anatomical proximity of the prostate gland to the rectum. To this end, several rectal sparing devices, including Endorectal balloons (ERBs), prostate-rectum spacers (e.g. SpaceOAR hydrogel), and rectal retractor have been explored to increase the distance between the prostate and the rectum to reduce rectal radiation doses and toxicities. Over the last decade, several studies applied these devices during post-prostatectomy radiotherapy setting. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to evaluate the impact of rectal sparing devices on dose-volume parameters of anorectal, radiation-induced rectal toxicity, and prostate bed motion during post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. The results showed that although using ERBs can lead to stability in the target volume position, it cannot reduce rectal radiation doses, in particular dose to the anterior rectal wall. The application of ERBs can reduce the received dose of the anal wall and increase the geometric reproducibility of the clinical target volume (CTV) position. However, the role of ERBs in reducing the received dose of the rectal wall is still controversial, which can be associated with the displacement of the anterior rectal wall towards the prostate bed (high radiation dose area). The use of SpaceOAR hydrogel can significantly increase the distance between the rectum and the prostate bed and ultimately reduce the dose received by the rectal wall. Also, the use of rectal retractor remarkably reduces rectal radiation doses. The dosimetric and clinical results of the use of SpaceOAR hydrogel and rectal retractor are very promising, and these devices can be used for patients after the necessary evaluations by radiation oncologist in post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. However, further studies will be required to elucidate the efficacy of SpaceOAR hydrogel and rectal retractor in reducing radiotherapy-induced rectal toxicity following post-prostatectomy radiotherapy.

Keywords: prostatectomy, prostate cancer, radiotherapy, rectum.


Maryam Bahadur, Zahra Momeni,
Volume 83, Issue 3 (6-2025)
Abstract

Background: Radiotherapy is one modalities for common cancers like cervical and endometrial. Although radiation therapy has side effects such as digestive problems and radiation-induced changes in the sacrum. At the current article, the factors that evaluate the side effects of radiation therapy for two energies of 6 and 15 megavoltage were compared.
Methods: For this study, the data of 50 female patients with an average age of 58.5 years with cervical and endometrial cancers were used. For each patient, the BOX treatment plan was carried out with Eclipse software for two energies, 6 and 15 MV, with total prescribed dose of 50 Gy. Along with factors such as dose homogeneity, sacrum bone dose, and maximum rectal dose were compared.
Results: The comparison reveals that the maximum rectal dose for 6 MV energy was significantly (Pvalue=0.001) more than those planed with 15 MV.
For the volume of the sacrum that receives a dose of 40 Gy (V_40), it was seen that for 6MV (99.86±0.42) energy, were significantly more than the treatment plan with 15 MV energy (99.83±0.48) (Pvalue=0.026). According to the homogeneity index for this study, a statistically significant difference was seen for the value obtained from HI2 and HI3 for 6 MV compared to 15 MV Pvalue<0.001, PValue=0.008 respectively which the treatment plans performed with 15 MV energy were more homogeneous than MV 6 energy.
Conclusion: In this article, it was observed that the use of low energies for the treatment of pelvic cancers, enhances the percentage of the maximum dose reached to healthy organs, which causes patients to suffer complications Therefore, it is recommended to use high energy, such as 15 MV, to reduce the side effects of radiotherapy, and also it has been suggested that patients should be followed up for 3 to 5 years in order to obtain more reliable information about the sacrum dose.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb