Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Regional Anesthesia

Amiri Hr, Makarem J,
Volume 67, Issue 2 (5-2009)
Abstract

Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE AR-SA MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Background: Successful brachial plexus blocks rely on proper techniques of nerve localization, needle placement, and local anesthetic injection. Standard approaches used today (elicitation of paresthesia or nerve-stimulated muscle contraction), unfortunately, are all "blind" techniques resulting in procedure-related pain and complications. Ultrasound guidance for brachial plexus blocks can potentially improve success and complication rates. This study presents the ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks for the first time in Iran in adults and pediatrics.
Methods: In this study ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks in 30 patients (25 adults & 5 pediatrics) scheduled for an elective upper extremity surgery, are introduced. Ultrasound imaging was used to identify the brachial plexus before the block, guide the block needle to reach target nerves, and visualize the pattern of local anesthetic spread. Needle position was further confirmed by nerve stimulation before injection. Besides basic variables, block approach, block time, postoperative analgesia duration (VAS<3 was considered as target pain control) opioid consumption during surgery, patient satisfaction and block related complications were reported.
Results: Mean adult age was 35.5±15 and in pediatric group was 5.2±4. Frequency of interscalene, supraclavicular, axillary approaches to brachial plexus in adults was 5, 7, 13 respectively. In pediatrics, only supraclavicular approach was accomplished. Mean postoperative analgesia time in adults was 8.5±4 and in pediatrics was 10.8±2. No block related complication were observed and no supplementary, were needed.

Conclusions: Real-time ultrasound imaging during brachial plexus blocks can facilitate nerve localization and needle placement and examine the pattern and extend of local anesthetic spread.


Kambiz Javadzadeh Siahkelrodi , Shahpour Shoja, Karim Naseri, Farzad Sarshivi, Shahrokh Ebnerasouli, Mohamad Aziz Rasouli , Shaho Shoja ,
Volume 79, Issue 7 (10-2021)
Abstract

Background: Bier block is a reliable technique used in extremity surgeries. Typically, angiocatheters are palced in the distal portion of the extremity that is going to be operated. Although, it is not the case in every operation. Therefore, determining the effectiveness of the local anesthetic injection site on the quality of the upper-extremity block can be helpful.
Methods: In this double-blinded randomized clinical trial that took place in Kowsar Hospital (Sanandaj, Iran) at 2020, 60 patients after complete monitoring and sedation were assigned randomly into proximal bier block (32 in experimental) and distal bier block (28 in control) groups. 10ml/kg Ringer serum was prescribed for patients in both groups on the non-surgical hand. Depending on the patients’ placement in either group, an angiocatheter (22 or 24) was attached to the ante-cubital area (proximal bier block group) or on the back of the patient's hand (distal bier block group). Respectively, after blood was drained by a Smarch band from the extremity that was to be operated, the tourniquet was inflated up to 150mmHg above the patient’s systolic pressure and the smarch band is untied from the hand. For every patient regarding the group they were assigned, 3mg/kg lidocaine 0.5% was administered through an angiocatheter. After 5 minutes, the depth of patient's anesthesia and pain intensity were measured. Sensory and motor recovery was assessed every 10 minutes after surgery. Patient satisfaction with anesthesia was measured after the surgery and characterized by excellent, good, moderate (pain relief), and unsuccessful (need for pain medications) indicators. In case insufficient depth was reached, intravenous Remifentanil was injected.
Results: According to the results of the chi-squared test, there were no significant differences in gender distribution (p=0.063), anesthesia class type (p=0.964), type of surgery (p=0.694), anesthesia satisfaction (p=0.578), sensory block of hand (p=0.529), motor block of hand (p=0.059), pain intensity (p= 0.634), pain relief medication requesting (p=0.755) and also body mass index (T-test used P=0.099) variables comparing both groups together. Additionally; according to the T-test results no significant differences were reported in the mean systolic pressure, mean diastolic pressure and mean heart rate variable in designated times.
Conclusion: There is no significant difference between the two groups. Therefore, using a distal Bier block can be an alternative if needed.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb