Showing 2 results for Shoulder Pain.
Seyedeh-Saeideh Hoseini, Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari, Soofia Naghdi ,
Volume 78, Issue 6 (9-2020)
Abstract
Background: Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is a specific questionnaire for the assessment of pain and function in subjects with shoulder pain. The reliability and validity of the Persian version of this questionnaire have been shown previously. But its responsiveness has not been investigated yet. This study aimed to determine the Persian OSS responsiveness in subjects with shoulder pain.
Methods: This was a prospective cohort study design conducted in the Physiotherapy Clinic, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2018. Thirty-one subjects with shoulder pain (20 females and 11 males) with a mean age of 50±15.3 participated in this study. They completed the Persian OSS, Disability of Arm, Shoulder & Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before and after 10 physiotherapy sessions. After the 10th session, the Global Rating of Change (GRC) was also completed. The statistical analysis included the Effect Size (ES), Standardized Response Mean (SRM), and the Spearman or Pearson correlation coefficients.
|
Results: The results showed that the ES and SRM of the Persian OSS were 1.73 and 1.79, respectively. The correlation between the Persian OSS and the VAS scores was 0.69 and between the Persian OSS and the DASH scores was 0.89. The correlation between the Persian OSS changes and GRC was not statistically significant (r=0.25, P=0.18). However, a significant moderate correlation was identified between the VAS and DASH with the GRC scores (r=0.43, r=0.42, respectively).
Conclusion: The Persian OSS has internal and external responsiveness for the assessment of subjects with shoulder pain. The Persian OSS, as a responsive instrument, can be used to investigate the effectiveness of interventions in the clinical settings and research to detect the changes in patients with shoulder pain. Further study with larger sample of patients with shoulder pain is warranted to confirm the findings and to estimate the minimally clinically important change.
|
Naseh Yousefi, Katayoun Moradi, Korosh Mansouri , Simin Sajadi , Masoud Torabi ,
Volume 82, Issue 12 (3-2025)
Abstract
Background: The most common cause of Shoulder pain is inflammation in the subacromial bursa. Intra-bursal corticosteroid injections are one of the most common methods in cases of bursitis. Recently, botulinum toxin A injection has also been used as a safe treatment in these patients. This injection does not have many of corticosteroid disadvantages. The most important disadvantages of this method are its cost. This study was performed to compare corticosteroids with botulinum toxin A in the treatment of subacromial bursitis by single injection.
Methods: This study is a prospective randomized clinical trial performed on patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy who were referred to the physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic of Iran University of Medical Sciences from November 2020 to October 2021. 54 patients with signs and symptoms of rotator cuff tendinopathy, were randomly assigned to one of the two groups of botulinum toxin A or corticosteroid injection. Routine treatment included exercise training for all patients. Patient's symptoms were assessed using VAS, Constant Score and SPADI criteria before treatment, two weeks and two months after injection.
Results: In the VAS study, both groups showed an improvement over baseline (P=0.000), which was significantly greater in the corticosteroid group. VAS between the first and second follow-up showed a decrease in the botulinum toxin A group and an increase in the corticosteroid group. In the Constant Score and SPADI study, both groups showed an improvement over baseline.
Conclusion: This study showed that a single-session injection of botulinum toxin A is less effective than corticosteroid in controlling symptoms of these patients. However, the therapeutic effect of botulinum toxin A, remains 2 months and unlike corticosteroid, has more reliability and durability.
