Search published articles


Showing 4 results for Standards

Akbarian M, Davachi F, Salim Zadeh A, Shahram F, Gharib Doost F, Tajy A H, Pajoohi M, Jamshidi Ar ,
Volume 60, Issue 4 (7-2002)
Abstract

Introduction: The bone mass density (BMD) may vary in different countries due to different genetic and environmental factors. This study was performed to determine the BMD of the normal population in Iran.

Methods and Materials: Subjects were selected randomly from different works and social classes in Tehran (from the lowest to the highest). For each decade and sexes, 20 normal subjects were selected (140 men and 140 women). BMD was measured with a Hologic 1000 plus machine by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) method for the lumber spine (L1, L2, L3, L4, L1-L4) and the femoral neck (neck, trochanter, intertrochanter, ward, total). Data were treated by polynomial approximation (3 rd degree). The obtained curves were compared with the standard Hologic curves for Caucasians.

Results: In female the peak bone mass (PBM) was 1.019 g/cm² for the lumbar spine and 0.832 for the femoral neck. In male the peak bone mass (PBM) was 0.987 g/cm² for the lumbar spine and 0.907 for the femoral neck. The BMD of both lumbar spine and femoral neck were lower than the Hologic standards. For the lumbar spine the mean difference was 6.5 percent (2 to 21 percent, CI=1) for women and 13.8 percent (2 to 36 percent, CI=1.45) for men. In femoral neck the mean difference was 5.4 percent (2 to 16 percent, CI=0.96) for women and 4.6 percent (1 to 14 percent, CI=0.96) for men.

Conclusion: The BMD of the lumbar spine and the femoral neck was lower in Iranian compared to the Hologic standards for Caucasians. This was seen in all age groups and in both sexes. It was less pronounced for the PBM in spine was lower in men than woman. The lower BMD of the spine in men was also seen in a cohort of patients with different diseases (inflammatory and non-inflammatory).


Sara Dorri , Alireza Atashi , Safoura Dorri , Ebrahim Abbasi , Mohsen Alijani-Zamani , Najme Nazeri ,
Volume 74, Issue 10 (1-2017)
Abstract

Background: There is no need to explain the importance of collection, recording and analyzing the information of disease in any health organization. In this regard, systematic design of standard data sets can be helpful to record uniform and consistent information. It can create interoperability between health care systems. The main purpose of this study was design the core dataset to record colorectal cancer information in Iran.

Methods: For the design of the colorectal cancer core data set, a combination of literature review and expert consensus were used. In the first phase, the draft of the data set was designed based on colorectal cancer literature review and comparative studies. Then, in the second phase, this data set was evaluated by experts from different discipline such as medical informatics, oncology and surgery. Their comments and opinion were taken. In the third phase refined data set, was evaluated again by experts and eventually data set was proposed.

Results: In first phase, based on the literature review, a draft set of 85 data elements was designed. In the second phase this data set was evaluated by experts and supplementary information was offered by professionals in subgroups especially in treatment part. In this phase the number of elements totally were arrived to 93 numbers. In the third phase, evaluation was conducted by experts and finally this dataset was designed in five main parts including: demographic information, diagnostic information, treatment information, clinical status assessment information, and clinical trial information.

Conclusion: In this study the comprehensive core data set of colorectal cancer was designed. This dataset in the field of collecting colorectal cancer information can be useful through facilitating exchange of health information. Designing such data set for similar disease can help providers to collect standard data from patients and can accelerate retrieval from storage systems.


Babak Mostafazadeh , Mohammad Hosien Kamaloddini , Fares Najari ,
Volume 75, Issue 6 (9-2017)
Abstract

Background: The death certificate is a document consisting of the deceased individual’s basic information and identification which is filled out, registered and signed by a doctor. the World health organization’s policies in their health planning, provide a suitable database with knowledge of the required elements for planners and other authorized information demanders. During a multi-year cooperation between various organizations, the first uniformed death certificate according the ICD-10 standard got published in the country in the year 2004.
Methods: This is a retrospective study which is about all of the deceased individuals in  Tajrish and Modares Tehran hospitals from april 2013 until the march 2014 who had death certificates. In this study the data related to 777 individual’s death certificates and medical files was analyzed. The sampling method was census and all the cases in the study’s time period who had death certificates were studied. The cases that had a gap in their required information were ruled out of the study. The data that included age, sex, place of death, issuing doctor’s expertise, general information and the cause of death was extracted from the archived files.
Results: The cases studied, 421 people died in Tajrish Hospital and 356 in Modarres Hospital. The highest number of deaths in both hospitals were in the internal wards (336 cases) and surgery (168 people). 45.6% of death certificates have been issued by a forensic expert. 64.8% cases correctly inserted ICD-10 code.
Conclusion: Training of physicians for the importance of death certificate and how it should be completed is very important. This research showed that in the cases which the death certificates were completed by the hospital forensic medicine specialists were more useful and accurate.

Fatemeh Masaebi , Farid Zayeri , Malihe Nasiri , Mehdi Azizmohammad Looha ,
Volume 76, Issue 11 (2-2019)
Abstract

Considering the advancement of medical sciences, diagnostic tests have been developed to distinguish patients from healthy population. Therefore, Determining and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy tests is of great importance. The accuracy of a test under evaluation is determined through the amount of agreement between its results with the results of the gold standard, and this test accuracy can be defined based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and the area under the receiver operative characteristic curve (AUC). Gold standard is an accurate and error- free method to determine the presence or absence of disease of interest and classify patients, which is not available in some diseases and situations as this method is costly or invasive. In these cases, reference standard is a best available replacement method to be used by physicians to diagnostic disease. However, in some situation, the acceptable reference standard is invasive or costly and does not exist or unreliable. It can be imperfect and results of the reference standard method are not necessarily error- free and cannot be applied to everyone in the study; all these cases point to the conditions in which the gold standard is not available. The use of reference standard including error causes to incorrect separation of patients from healthy population and thus, it cannot be a comparing measure for other diagnostic tests and its results are inaccurate. Therefore, other alternatives methods are needed for evaluation and determine the diagnostic accuracy tests when the gold standard does not exist. Imputation method, correct imperfect reference standard method, the construct reference standard method, latent class models, differential verification, composite reference standard and discrepant analysis are of these alternative methods. Each of these methods, considering its features, advantages, and limitations can be used to evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic test in the absence of gold standard. The present study gave an overview of methods to evaluation of diagnostic accuracy tests when there is no gold standard and the focus of this study was on explain the concept of these solutions, review and compare them and their strengths and weaknesses.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb