Aghajanzadeh M, Safarpoor F, Khoshrang H, Mohammadzadeh A, Khatmi N,
Volume 64, Issue 12 (11-2006)
Abstract
Background: Pain control after posterolateral thoracotomy is very important for adequate respiration and to reduce pulmonary complications. Narcotic-induced respiratory depression requires different intercostal nerve block procedures with local anesthesia, such as bupivacaine, through an extrapleural catheter, paravertebral catheter and intrapleural injection in order to control pain and reduce narcotics consumption. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of bupivacain versus normal saline (N/S) in pain control after thoracotomy.
Methods: In a single-blind clinical trial, forty patients were divided into two groups of 20 patients each. Group 1 (G.1) received a single dose (10 ml) of bupivacaine 0.5%, followed by continuous infusion of N/S (0.1 ml/kg/h) four hours after surgery. Group 2 (G.2) received a single dose (10 ml) of bupivacaine 0.5%, followed by a continuous infusion of bupivacaine (0.1 ml/kg/h) four hours after surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed every four hours for 48 hours by linear visual analog scale (VAS). If VAS > 5, then pethidine was injected at a dosage of 1 mg/kg/IM. VAS ≤ 3 was considered pain control.
Results: TThe mean VAS at 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours after surgery in G.1 was 7.6, 5.5, 6.6, 5.5 and 5.7, respectively, and in G.2 was 3.4, 3.7, 2.8, 2.1 and 1.9, respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (for 12 hours P<0.001 and for other time points P=0.0001). During the 4-24 hour period after surgery, pain control in G.1 was 5% and in G.2 was 81%. The mean VAS at 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48 hours after surgery in G.1 was 5.2, 5, 5.3, 4.4, 5.1, and 4.8, respectively, and in G.2 was 1.6, 1.8, 1.5, 1.6, 1.5 and 1.4, respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.0001). In the first 24 hours, the mean of pethidine injection in G.1 was 3.7 and in G.2 was 0.6 (P<0.0001). In the second 24 hours, the mean pethidine injection in G.1 was 2.2 and in G.2 there was no need for pethidine (p<0.0001).
Conclusion: Continuous extrapleural infusion of bupivacaine is effective in pain control and decreasing demand for narcotics after thoracotomy.
Alavi A, Jalali Sm, Hajmobini A, Peiravy Sereshke H,
Volume 67, Issue 7 (10-2009)
Abstract
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
AR-SA
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
Background: Standard thoracotomy necessitates division of
thoracic large muscles leading to pain and impaired respiratory movements
muscle sparing postero-lateral thoracotomy has been suggested as an alternative
to reduce the aforementioned effect. The aim of this study was to compare
muscle saving posterolateral thoracotomy with standard thoracotomy.
Methods: This study was a clinical
trial. All patients who were candidates for elective thoracotomy were included
and divided into two groups of muscle saving thoracotomy and standard
thoracotomy randomly. Required time for opening and closing the chest, amount
of prescribed narcotics, shoulder movements (flexion, extension, abduction and
internal rotation), pulmonary function (FVC, FEV1, VC), development of seroma, and
duration of hospitalization were assessed. Shoulder movements and pulmonary
function were measured immediately before operation and 7 days later while pain
measured in 1st and 7th post-operative days.
Results: 60 patients (42 males) entered the study and
there were no significant differences regarding age and sex distribution
between two groups (p>0.05). Mean
duration of opening the chest in muscle saving thoracotomy was significantly
longer than standard procedure while the duration of closing the chest wall was
significantly shorter in muscle saving thoracotomy (p<0.05). FVC and range of motion of the
shoulder were higher and post-operative pain was lesser in muscle saving
thoraocotomy than standard thoracotomy (p<0.05). There were no significant differences regarding
prescribed narcotics and duration of hospital stay (p>0.05). Seroma developed in 13% (n=4) of muscle saving group.
Conclusion: Muscle saving thoracotomy can be used as an
appropriate alternative for standard postero-lateral thoracotomy in elective
thoracic operations.