Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Visual Evoked Potential

Harirchian Mh, Karimi N, Abdollahi Y, Hashemi Chalavi L,
Volume 67, Issue 1 (4-2009)
Abstract

Background: Visual, brain stem auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials (EPs) have been traditional paraclinical tests to evaluate the competency of sensory tracts in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. It seems that only one of these EPs could be sufficient, at least as a screening test. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the frequency of these three evoked potentials in definite MS patients.

Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study involved was 25 definite relapsing remitting MS patients who referred to our university hospital. Twenty five individuals from normal population without any neurologic, visual, auditory or sensory disorders have been evaluated as well to determine the standard values in our electrophysiology lab. Values more than mean+2.5SD for latencies and less than mean-2.5SD for amplitudes were considered as abnormal.

Results: Fifteen (60%), 13 (52%), and 13 (52%) had abnormal visual, auditory and somatosensory EPs respectively. The latency of P100 in visual EP (VEP) had the most sensitivity among all of the parameters. It was determined that the possibility of abnormality in each of auditory and somatosensory EPs in the presence of normal VEP could be 30.8%. In other words 30.8% of patients with negative VEP could have a positive auditory brain stem or somatosensory EPs.

Conclusion: In our study, a VEP abnormality was more frequent than auditory brain stem and somatosensory EPs. Thus it is not logical to perform triple EP tests in all suspected MS patients, but auditory and somatosensory EPs could be considered in patients with normal VEP.


Narges Khodaparast, Nazila Malekian, Zahra Vahabi, Davood Fathi, Shahram Oveisgharan, Farzad Fatehi, Siamak Abdi,
Volume 78, Issue 5 (8-2020)
Abstract

Background: Alzheimer dementia as the most common cause of dementia is a chronic, progressive, irreversible and incurable disease. The second most common cause of dementia after Alzheimer is vascular dementia. One of the systems involved in dementia is the visuospatial system and visual evoked potential (VEP) can be one of the diagnostic methods for this disease. Therefore, the present study aims to compare visual evoked potential changes in Alzheimer dementia, vascular dementia and patients with minimally conscious impairment (MCI) with healthy people.
Methods: A case-control study was performed on referred clients to Shariati Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from April 2015 to September 2016. Patients with cognitive impairment went through Montreal cognitive assessment (MOCA) test and divided into three groups of Alzheimer dementia, vascular dementia and patients with minimally conscious impairment. Subjects with normal cognition were included in the control group. The visual evoked potential test was performed on all participants in two Methods: pattern shift visual evoked potential (Ps-VEP) and flash visual evoked potential (f-VEP) and results were compared between groups.
Results: Forty patients were studied in four groups (three patient groups and one control group). 70 percent in Alzheimer group and 60 percent in vascular dementia group had abnormal pattern shift visual evoked potential. Only in Alzheimer group visual evoked potential P100 latency was significantly higher than control group and in other groups, there was no significant difference. Also there was no significant difference between groups in the study of flash visual evoked potential variables including P1, N2, P2 and N3.
Conclusion: This study showed that only Alzheimer was associated with a significant increase in visual evoked potential P100 latency. On the other hand the other hand, there was no significant difference in flash visual evoked potential variables including P1, N2, P2 and N3 between different groups which shows that flash visual evoked potential cannot differentiate between Alzheimer dementia, vascular dementia, patients with minimally conscious impairment and normal people.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2026 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb