Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Methodology

Sh Rahimi Kamal, J Nasl Saraji, I Mohammad Fam ,
Volume 7, Issue 4 (2-2010)
Abstract

  Background and Aim: Human error often plays an important role in accident causation either through direct action or poor design . The focus of this work is was on prediction of human error probabilities during the process of emergency musters on in gas compressor stations . This paper aims to present a brief description of Human Error Probability Index (HEPI) for the on gas compressor station musters process.

  Materials and Methods : Due to a lack of human error databases, and in particular human error data on gas compressor station musters, an expert judgment technique, the Success Likelihood Index Methodology (SLIM), , was adopted as a means to predict human error probabilities Two muster scenarios of varying severity (gas release, fire and explosion) were studied in detail . A total of 34 reference graphs provided data for both the weighting and rating of six performance shaping factors and the data were subsequently processed by means of SLIM to calculate the probability of success for 16 muster actions ranging from point of muster initiator to the final actions in the temporary safe refuge (TSR). The actions were categorized into 4 phases, namely, awareness, evaluation, egress, and recovery phases. The six performance shaping factors considered in this work were stress, complexity , training, experience, event factors, and atmospheric factors .

  Results: Human error probabilities in the egress phase were highest, followed by those in the evaluation phase the lowest were in the awareness phase.

  Conclusion: The HEPI can be applied to limit the chances of human error occurrence and mitigate the consequences of such errors through changes in training, design, safety systems, and procedures, resulting in a more error-tolerant design and operation .


Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad, Mahdiyeh Heydari, Mahya Abbasi, Mehdi Abbasi,
Volume 19, Issue 1 (6-2021)
Abstract

Background and Aim: The realist review has been introduced to review and synthesize the evidence related to the implementation of complex healthcare interventions. This method interprets the results of an intervention by explaining the causal relationships between the intervention and the results. This study aimed to explain the methodology of realist review in the health system.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted using the scoping review. The following databases were used to find articles using appropriate search strategies and relevant key words: Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Embase electronic databases, as well as Google Scholar and Google search engines. Finally 49 articles were selected (in the period between January 1990 and December 2020) for review.
Results: The realist review is a theory-based approach to synthesize evidence related to the complex interventions, explaining the reasons for the successes or failures of interventions based on the causal relationships between the interventions, contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. A protocol was introduced to conduct a realist review composed of three phases ─ explaining, development and correcting the intervention program theory ─ and including seven steps of determining research questions; explaining the initial program theory; developing search strategies; collecting, evaluating and selecting evidence; synthesizing evidence; modifying the initial theory; and making suggestions. In addition, the structure of a realist review article was described and a checklist for evaluation of a realist review study was introduced.
Conclusion: The realist review is a suitable method for reviewing the complex health system interventions, explaining how an intervention relates to the results obtained. A realist review explains how, under what conditions and for whom a health and therapeutic intervention works.

Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, CC BY-NC 4.0

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb